Multi-flange Hull Design for Marine Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current watercraft designs are unstable and unsafe during maneuvers and rough water conditions due to insufficient stability and grip, leading to instability forces that can cause users to overcompensate, resulting in impacts and fatigue.

Innovation Solution

A multi-flange hull design with vertically displaced flanges providing incremental gripping surfaces and reducing instability forces, along with a flexible intermediate panel for shock absorption, enhances stability and safety by creating multiple gripping surfaces and reducing the risk of tipping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a single bond flange design is used, then the structure is simple, but stability and grip are insufficient during maneuvers and rough water

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidflange design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single flange is divided into multiple flanges (first flange, second flange, third flange) positioned at different vertical levels. Each flange provides gripping surface area at a specific height, creating incremental stability forces that prevent watercraft instability during banking and rough water conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flanges are arranged vertically at different heights (first flange at higher vertical position, second flange at intermediate position, third flange at lower position) rather than horizontally. This vertical dimensionality creates multiple gripping surfaces that engage water at different levels, enhancing stability without significantly increasing horizontal complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Stability of the object's composition

If flanges are submerged during banking, then gripping force is lost, but stability forces are counteracted by instability forces

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidinstability forces
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The multiple flanges are positioned at different vertical heights to provide preliminary anti-action against instability forces. When the watercraft banks, the higher flanges may become submerged and lose gripping force, but the lower flanges remain exposed and continue to provide stability forces, preventing complete loss of control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The vertically distributed flanges act as a cushioning system against instability. If one flange becomes submerged and loses effectiveness, the other flanges at different heights provide backup gripping force, cushioning the transition and preventing sudden instability that would require user overcompensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Ease of operation

If users apply leaning force to overcome stability forces, then control is maintained, but excessive leaning force causes tipping or slamming

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehandlingVSAvoidimpacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The multiple flanges provide partial gripping forces at different heights, allowing users to apply partial leaning forces rather than excessive force. The incremental stability forces from each flange reduce the total leaning force needed, preventing overcompensation that leads to tipping or slamming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11897590B2Multi-flange design for marine industry
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 EFFICIENT POWER DESIGN LLC
  • US11897590B2 patent drawing
  • US11897590B2 patent drawing
  • US11897590B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A watercraft with improved safety and stability is provided. The watercraft includes a shell defining a plurality of raceways for receiving water during certain maneuvers of the watercraft, thereby exerting force upon the watercraft in a first direction. The shell is configured so as to prevent or otherwise inhibit the water from exerting an opposed second force upon the watercraft. An intermediate panel of the shell provides increased flexibility, thereby serving as a shock absorber for the watercraft.