Multi-Friction Cutting Face for Steering Formation Chips

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Earth-boring tools face challenges in efficiently directing formation chips due to uniform friction characteristics on cutting elements, leading to accumulation and degradation of drilling performance.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of cutting elements with a cutting face featuring distinct areas of varying surface roughness, where one area has a lower coefficient of sliding friction and the other a higher, strategically oriented to steer chips and improve directional flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If the cutting face has a polished surface finish (0.3-2.0 μin. RMS), then chip sliding is facilitated and balling is reduced, but chip directional control is insufficient leading to accumulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip accumulation and ballingVSAvoidchip directional control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting face is divided into distinct zones with different surface finishes: a polished zone (0.3-2.0 μin. RMS) near the cutting edge for chip sliding, and a roughened zone (2.0-20 μin. RMS) at the upper portion for chip accumulation and directional control. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by providing both smooth sliding at the contact point and controlled accumulation at the discharge point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting face surface is segmented into multiple functional zones with varying roughness characteristics. The lower portion near the cutting edge maintains a polished finish to reduce friction and prevent balling, while the upper portion is roughened to promote chip accumulation and directional flow toward evacuation areas, thus solving both chip control issues simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If the cutting face has a rough surface finish (2.0-20 μin. RMS), then chip accumulation is promoted for evacuation, but chip sliding is impeded causing balling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip directional control and evacuationVSAvoidchip balling and accumulation at wrong location
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different zones of the cutting face are assigned different surface quality characteristics: the lower zone near the cutting edge is polished to enable smooth chip sliding and prevent balling, while the upper zone is roughened to promote chip accumulation and directional flow toward evacuation areas, thus resolving the contradiction between sliding and evacuation requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting face is segmented into functional zones with distinct surface finishes. The polished zone at the bottom facilitates chip sliding off the cutting edge, while the roughened zone at the top promotes chip accumulation and directs them toward evacuation areas, preventing both balling and evacuation problems simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If the cutting face has uniform friction characteristics, then manufacturing is simplified, but chip flow directionality is poor leading to performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting face fabricationVSAvoiddrilling performance and chip transport efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting face is engineered with locally differentiated surface properties: a polished region near the cutting edge for easy chip release, and a roughened region at the upper portion for chip accumulation and directional control. This local quality variation improves chip flow directionality and drilling performance while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through selective surface treatment processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting face surface is segmented into zones with different friction characteristics. The polished zone reduces friction for chip sliding, while the roughened zone increases friction for chip accumulation and directional flow. This segmentation enhances chip transport efficiency and drilling performance without significantly complicating the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively steers formation chips into desired paths, enhancing drilling efficiency by reducing frictional resistance and improving chip transport, thereby improving drilling performance and reducing wear on the tool.

Implementation Method 1

The at least a second area has a second average surface roughness which is greater than the average surface roughness of the at least a first area. The first area and the second area are oriented to cause the second area to provide a greater sliding friction force than a sliding friction force provided by the first area to a chip of subterranean formation material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11229989B2Methods of forming cutting elements with cutting faces exhibiting multiple coefficients of friction, and related methods
Publication Date: 2022.01.25 BAKER HUGHES CO
  • US11229989B2 patent drawing
  • US11229989B2 patent drawing
  • US11229989B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An earth-boring tool having at least one cutting element with a multi-friction cutting face provides for the steering of formation cuttings as the cuttings slide across the cutting face. The multi-friction cutting element includes a diamond table bonded to a substrate of superabrasive material. The diamond table has a cutting face formed thereon with a cutting edge extending along a periphery of the cutting face. The cutting face has a first area having an average surface finish roughness less than an average surface finish roughness of a second area of the cutting face, the two areas separated by a boundary having a proximal end proximate a tool crown and a distal end remote from the tool crown.