Multi-geography Orchestration Using Hierarchical Locking
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current orchestration systems face challenges in scaling out across multiple geographies due to high network latency and compromised transactional consistency, leading to inefficiencies and errors in processing and execution times.
Innovation Solution
The orchestration cluster node system analyzes usage patterns between clusters to coordinate processes, implements tree-structured locking, and uses optimistic locking to ensure data integrity, reducing latency and improving scalability by maintaining autonomy and distributed orchestration across geographies.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If orchestration systems scale out across multiple geographies, then processing capacity and scalability are improved, but network latency increases and transactional consistency deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The system segments the distributed orchestration problem into local and global components. Local orchestrators handle geographically proximate tasks independently to maintain low latency, while a global orchestrator coordinates cross-geography workflows. This segmentation allows the system to scale out across multiple geographies without sacrificing transactional consistency, as each segment operates autonomously within its latency constraints while maintaining global coherence through the orchestrator.
2Productivity
If orchestration systems scale out across multiple geographies, then processing capacity is improved, but network latency increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system applies local quality by enabling local orchestrators to autonomously handle geographically proximate orchestration tasks without requiring constant communication across the distributed network. This local autonomy reduces network latency for common operations, while the global orchestrator intervenes only when cross-geography coordination is necessary, thus maintaining high processing capacity without proportionally increasing latency.
3Reliability
If orchestration systems use centralized coordination, then transactional consistency is improved, but scalability and autonomy are worsened
Solution Approach 1:
The system transitions from a single-dimension centralized coordination model to a multi-dimensional hierarchical orchestration model. Local orchestrators operate autonomously in their respective geographical dimensions, maintaining scalability and low latency, while the global orchestrator provides coordination across the geographical dimension. This dimensional transformation allows the system to achieve both transactional consistency and scalability simultaneously.
Data Source
AI summary
An orchestration cluster node system may include a plurality of local orchestration cluster nodes. Each local cluster node may include a service request executor, coordination function, and a resource manager. Each local cluster node may operate in a geography and the coordination functions of local cluster codes may communicate to coordinate execution of services across geographies.