Multi-Grid Load Balancing via Peer-to-Peer Protocols

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional grid computing systems face inefficiencies due to their monolithic architecture, which can lead to bottlenecks and single points of failure, and lack effective load balancing across distributed resources, resulting in suboptimal job processing and resource utilization.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an autonomic grid computing mechanism that utilizes peer-to-peer platform protocols, such as JXTA, to create a multi-grid network where job submitters can dynamically discover and distribute jobs across multiple grids based on load balancing criteria, including pending jobs and processing capabilities, thereby optimizing resource utilization and fault tolerance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a monolithic grid architecture is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but load balancing capability deteriorates and bottlenecks occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrid architectureVSAvoidload balancing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the monolithic grid into multiple independent grid cells, each with its own master node and compute nodes. This segmentation enables distributed load balancing across cells while maintaining simplicity within each cell. The load balancer operates at the grid cell level, distributing jobs across multiple cells to avoid bottlenecks in a single monolithic structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If a monolithic grid architecture is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but fault tolerance deteriorates due to single point of failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrid architectureVSAvoidfault tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the grid into multiple independent cells, the patent eliminates the single point of failure characteristic of monolithic architectures. If one cell experiences failure, other cells continue to operate independently. Each cell has its own master node that can fail without affecting the entire grid system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by allowing each grid cell to have independent failure characteristics and recovery mechanisms. The load balancer can detect failures at the cell level and redirect jobs to healthy cells, ensuring continuous operation even when individual cells fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If manual configuration is used for grid resources, then system control is maintained, but scalability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem controlVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automatic resource discovery and registration. Compute nodes automatically register themselves with the load balancer when joined to the grid, and the load balancer automatically monitors resource availability and distributes jobs without manual intervention. This enables scalability while maintaining operational control through automated policies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The load balancer continuously monitors the status of compute nodes and grid cells, using this feedback to dynamically adjust job distribution. This feedback mechanism enables the system to scale automatically by detecting available resources and assigning jobs accordingly, without requiring manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If jobs are distributed across multiple grids, then fault tolerance is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault toleranceVSAvoidmulti-grid system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a load balancer as an intermediary component that manages the complexity of distributing jobs across multiple grid cells. The load balancer handles failover logic, resource allocation, and communication coordination, shielding users from the underlying multi-grid complexity while enabling improved fault tolerance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8886744B1Load balancing in multi-grid systems using peer-to-peer protocols
Publication Date: 2014.11.11 SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC
  • US8886744B1 patent drawing
  • US8886744B1 patent drawing
  • US8886744B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A load-balancing mechanism for grids in a multi-grid network. Using embodiments, one or more job submitters may distribute jobs to grids in a multi-grid network according to the load of the grids, thus spreading the load of jobs to be processed among the grids and helping to insure that jobs are handled in a timely fashion. In one embodiment, a job submitter may use peer-to-peer platform protocols to obtain load information about the grids, and then use the information about the grids to select one of the grids to perform a particular job according to the load of the grids. Determining the load on the grids may be based on information acquired from the grids including one or more of, but not limited to, how many jobs are pending in a grid's job queue and estimated time for completing the jobs in the grid's job queue.