Multi-Head AFP Composite Preform Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for fabricating aircraft airframe components are labor-intensive and inefficient, particularly in the use of Automated Fiber Placement (AFP) machines that require a single head to trace the contour of components, limiting the speed and scalability of the manufacturing process.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for assembly line fabrication of airframe components using fiber-reinforced broad goods, where sheets are cut into layup pieces, rotated, and synchronized across multiple stations to form a layup pattern, which is then placed and compacted onto a mandrel to create a composite preform, allowing for rapid preparation and hardening of parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single head AFP machine is used to trace the contour of airframe components, then manufacturing precision can be maintained, but productivity is limited and the process becomes labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication speedVSAvoidmachine configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the airframe component into multiple zones and uses multiple AFP heads to work simultaneously on different zones. Each head is responsible for a specific segment of the component, allowing parallel fabrication operations that significantly increase productivity while maintaining precision through dedicated control of each head

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-head sequential approach to a multi-head parallel approach by adding spatial dimensionality to the fabrication system. Multiple heads are positioned at different locations and angles, enabling simultaneous deposition on different portions of the component, effectively moving from one-dimensional sequential processing to multi-dimensional parallel processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If hand-layup processes are used, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but labor intensity increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication efficiencyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated fiber placement systems that self-regulate and self-position multiple heads according to pre-programmed paths and parameters. The system automatically manages the complex coordination of multiple heads, resin delivery, and contour following without requiring manual intervention, thereby increasing efficiency while keeping the manufacturing process manageable through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual hand-layup mechanical operations with automated AFP machine systems. The mechanical actions of cutting, positioning, and placing fiber reinforcements are performed by automated mechanisms controlled by computer systems, eliminating labor-intensive operations while maintaining or improving precision and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If broad goods are cut and arranged using synchronized multi-station operations, then productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayup preparation speedVSAvoidnumber of stations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the layup preparation process into distinct segments handled by separate stations: cutting station for trimming broad goods, rotation station for orienting pieces, and assembly station for arranging pieces into layup patterns. This segmentation allows each station to specialize in one function and operate in parallel, increasing overall productivity while managing complexity through functional decomposition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions at dedicated stations before final assembly: broad goods are pre-cut to required dimensions at the cutting station, pre-rotated to correct orientations at the rotation station, and pre-positioned on carriers. These preliminary preparations are done in advance and in parallel, reducing the complexity and time of the final assembly operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12195201B2Composite preform assembly method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 THE BOEING CO
  • US12195201B2 patent drawing
  • US12195201B2 patent drawing
  • US12195201B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for fabricating a preform for a portion of an aircraft includes acquiring a sheet of broad good fiber reinforced material, trimming the sheet to form layup pieces having boundaries, placing the boundaries into alignment, arranging the layup pieces in a layup pattern to form a ply, performing a placement operation that transports the layup pattern onto a layup mandrel, and shaping the layup pattern into conformance with a contour of the layup mandrel.