Multi-Head Cutting Control for Variable Slab Load Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cutting equipment struggles with achieving optimal production efficiency due to uneven surface roughness and varying material hardness and density in engineered stone slabs, leading to uneven load on cutting heads and inefficient energy consumption, with existing automatic control methods often inhibiting production efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A central controller using current sensors and a computer program dynamically adjusts the cutting head motors' load currents, conveyor belt speed, and cutting head height to maintain each cutting head within a defined load range, ensuring optimal efficiency by monitoring real-time load currents and adjusting the system accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional methods set equal height reduction for each cutting head, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but energy consumption increases due to uneven load on cutting heads caused by surface roughness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of height adjustmentVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different height reductions to different cutting heads based on their individual load conditions. The controller monitors real-time load current for each cutting head and adjusts the height of each head independently, rather than applying a uniform height reduction to all heads. This localized adjustment optimizes energy consumption by matching each cutting head's engagement depth to its actual load capacity and the local surface conditions of the slab.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts cutting head heights during operation based on real-time feedback. The controller continuously monitors load current and automatically modifies the height position of cutting heads in response to changing conditions such as surface roughness variations and material hardness differences. This dynamic adjustment replaces static, pre-set height configurations with adaptive, real-time control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If conveyor belt speed is increased for softer material sections, then productivity improves, but motor overload risk increases due to varying material hardness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidmotor overload protection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses real-time feedback from load current sensors to control conveyor belt speed and cutting head position. When the load current indicates softer material or lighter loading conditions, the controller increases conveyor speed to boost productivity. When load current approaches overload thresholds, the controller reduces speed or adjusts cutting head height to prevent motor overload. This closed-loop feedback system dynamically balances productivity and motor protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (conveyor speed, cutting head height) in response to detected material conditions. For softer material sections, the controller increases conveyor speed and/or reduces cutting depth to maintain optimal load current levels. For harder material sections, the controller adjusts parameters to prevent overload while maintaining cutting effectiveness. This parameter adaptation enables the system to optimize productivity across varying material conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If cutting head height is manually adjusted for each section, then energy consumption is optimized, but automation level decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidautomatic control level
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment of cutting head heights and conveyor speed based on automatic monitoring of load current. The controller autonomously determines optimal operating parameters without requiring manual intervention. The system serves itself by using its own operational data (load current measurements) to make real-time adjustments, eliminating the need for operators to manually adjust heights while maintaining energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical adjustment with automated electronic control. Instead of operators physically adjusting cutting head positions based on experience or inspection, the controller uses electronic sensors to monitor load current and automatically actuates motors to adjust head height and conveyor speed. This substitution of manual mechanical operations with automated electromechanical systems maintains energy optimization while achieving full automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If equal surface material removal is set for each cutting head, then manufacturing precision is maintained, but production efficiency decreases due to frequent adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethickness uniformityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts cutting head heights during operation to maintain optimal load current while achieving the required thickness precision. Rather than using fixed, pre-calculated height settings that require frequent manual adjustments, the controller continuously adapts head positions based on real-time load monitoring. This dynamic control maintains manufacturing precision through automatic compensation for material variations, eliminating the need for frequent production stoppages for adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous cutting operation without interruption for manual adjustments. The automated controller continuously monitors load current and makes real-time adjustments to cutting head position and conveyor speed, ensuring the cutting process operates continuously at optimal efficiency. This eliminates the discontinuities caused by manual intervention while maintaining the precision required for equal surface material removal across all cutting heads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP3799583B1Cutting equipment and its controllers
Publication Date: 2022.09.14 XIE ALEX
  • EP3799583B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3799583B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3799583B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An apparatus including a controller, and at least two cutting head assemblies. The controller typically includes a computer processor, and a computer memory, having a computer program stored therein. The controller automatically controls the current load of a cutting motor of each of the at least two cutting head assemblies via current sensors, in response to monitoring real time current loads. The controller may also control feed mechanism speed. The feed mechanism may include a conveyor belt. The controller may also be programmed to control a position or height of each of the at least two cutting head assemblies with respect to the feed mechanism. The two or more cutting head assemblies may be attached to a frame, and the controller may control the movement of the frame perpendicular to the direction of movement of feeding mechanism. Cutting head pads may be monitored for wear and replaced if necessary.