Integrated Vehicle Rocker Beam with Multi-Hollow Cross-Section

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle structural components, such as rocker components, face challenges in efficiently distributing impact forces and meeting regulatory requirements while minimizing weight and material usage, particularly in integrating reinforcement beams that provide both strength and flexibility.

Innovation Solution

A multi-hollow reinforcement beam with a metal sheet cross-sectional shape and integral flange portions is used, which can be roll-formed to span vehicle components, reducing the need for additional panels and allowing for spot welding, thus enhancing structural support and reducing weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional separate reinforcement beams and panels are used, then structural strength is achieved, but weight and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the reinforcement beam and sill panel into a single integrated component formed from one continuous metal sheet. The multi-hollow cross-sectional shape integrates the structural beam function and panel function, eliminating the need for separate components and reducing overall weight while maintaining required structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated component performs multiple functions simultaneously: it provides reinforcement beam structural support, acts as a sill panel, and offers impact force distribution. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed, thereby reducing weight and material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of substance

If multi-hollow reinforcement beam with integral flange portions is used, then material usage is reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial usageVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs roll-forming technology to create the complex multi-hollow cross-sectional shape from a continuous metal sheet. This manufacturing process parameter change allows the integrated structure to be produced efficiently in a continuous operation, reducing manufacturing complexity despite the intricate geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The metal sheet is divided into functional zones during roll-forming, with different sections creating the beam portion, flange portions, and panel sections. This segmentation occurs during the forming process itself, allowing complex geometry to be manufactured efficiently without post-processing assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If separate components are used for reinforcement beam and sill panel, then ease of manufacture is maintained, but structural stiffness and impact resistance decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidstructural stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

By merging the reinforcement beam and sill panel into a single integrated component with continuous material flow, the patent eliminates weak joints and interfaces between separate parts. This integration significantly improves structural stiffness and impact resistance while the roll-forming process maintains manufacturing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Weight of moving object

If traditional reinforcement structures are used, then weight is higher, but impact force distribution capability is proven

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidimpact force distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite-like structure within a single material by forming multiple hollow cavities and thickened sections in specific locations. This internal composite structure optimizes impact force distribution throughout the component while reducing overall material usage and weight compared to traditional solid structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS12134425B2Vehicle rocker component
Publication Date: 2024.11.05 SHAPE CORP
  • US12134425B2 patent drawing
  • US12134425B2 patent drawing
  • US12134425B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rocker component for a vehicle having a reinforcement beam including a metal sheet that is shaped with a plurality of elongated bends extending in parallel along a length of the reinforcement beam that together form a cross-sectional shape extending continuously along the length of the reinforcement beam. The cross-sectional shape of the reinforcement beam includes a beam portion and a flange portion integrally extending from the beam portion and includes an edge of the metal sheet. The rocker component also includes a sill panel having flanges extending longitudinally along upper and lower edges of the sill panel relative to the vehicle, the flange portion of the reinforcement beam joined to one of the flanges of the sill panel to secure the reinforcement beam to the sill panel in replacement of a separate second sill panel.