Multi-hook Locking Device for Building Openings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing locking devices for constructions have limited mechanical strength and security due to reduced contact surface with the striker, making them vulnerable to break-ins, and are unable to guarantee high security levels against burglary attempts.

Innovation Solution

A locking device with at least two hooking means that can adopt an active hooking position with the locking striker, featuring movement drive means to drive these hooking means in opposition, reinforcing means to enhance attachment in the active position, and fixing means to strengthen the connection between the locking system and the frame or opening, thereby increasing mechanical strength and security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a single locking element (roller or hook) is used, then the device complexity is low, but the mechanical strength and security against forced entry are limited due to small contact surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is divided into multiple independent latching means (at least two), each capable of engaging with the strike plate separately. This segmentation allows the system to distribute mechanical stress across multiple contact points, thereby increasing overall mechanical strength while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple latching means are combined within a single locking system that operates through one locking rod. The latching means work together to provide enhanced security, merging their individual engagement forces to create a more robust locking mechanism that resists forced entry better than a single element could

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If a single locking element is used, then the ease of operation is high, but the reliability against forced entry is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity levelVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is divided into multiple independent latching means (at least two), each capable of engaging with the strike plate separately. This segmentation allows the system to distribute mechanical stress across multiple contact points, thereby increasing overall mechanical strength while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The latching means are designed to be movable relative to the housing, transitioning between inactive and active positions. This dynamic capability allows the system to respond to forcing attempts by maintaining engagement, with at least one latching means designed to resist movement under stress, thereby enhancing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If multiple latching means are used, then the mechanical strength is improved, but the driving mechanism complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoiddriving mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple latching means are combined within a single locking system that operates through one locking rod. The latching means work together to provide enhanced security, merging their individual engagement forces to create a more robust locking mechanism that resists forced entry better than a single element could

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The driving mechanism incorporates both primary means for driving the translation and secondary means for driving the movement. This multi-dimensional approach to actuation allows independent control of each latching means' engagement force and direction, managing the complexity of multiple actuators through structured spatial organization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP4424955A1Locking device for a closure device of an opening in a building
Publication Date: 2024.09.04 FERCO
  • EP4424955A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4424955A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4424955A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Locking device (1) for a closing installation (I) of an opening in a building.This locking device (1) includes a locking strike plate (2) and a locking system (3) which includes a housing, at least one locking rod (5) movable relative to the housing, at least two hooking means (6; 6') movable relative to the housing and adopting an inactive position and an active hooking position of said at least two hooking means (6; 6') with the locking strike plate (2) and an active position, means for mounting in movement of said at least two hooking means (6; 6') relative to the housing between the inactive position and the active hooking position and means for driving in movement of said at least two hooking means (6; 6') in the direction of the inactive hooking position or in the direction of the active hooking position, this under the impulse of the movement of the locking rod (5).