Multi-horizon Time Wheel for Flexible Task Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing task management software lacks flexibility in viewing variable time durations, leading to discontinuous transitions and poor integration of tasks assigned to multiple people, making it difficult for users to navigate and distinguish between different time horizons and individual tasks.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that allows users to adjust and display a time horizon smoothly, enabling seamless transitions between different time durations and clearly distinguishing tasks assigned to various individuals using color and integrated task displays.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If fixed time horizon views (day, week, month) are used, then the system is simple to implement, but the flexibility in viewing variable time durations is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in viewing variable time durationsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic time horizon display system that allows users to continuously adjust the time duration (e.g., from hours to days to weeks) rather than being constrained to fixed predefined views. The system dynamically recalculates and repositions task elements as the time horizon changes, enabling smooth transitions between different time scales without requiring discrete view switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows users to modify the time horizon parameter continuously (e.g., changing from a 1-day view to a 1-week view by adjusting a time duration parameter). This parameter-based approach enables flexible exploration of different time scales while maintaining a consistent display framework, avoiding the need for completely different display formats for each time horizon.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If discrete view transitions between time horizons are implemented, then the implementation is straightforward, but the transition smoothness and continuity are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransition smoothnessVSAvoidmental effort for transition
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous transitions between different time horizon views by dynamically adjusting the display as the time duration parameter changes. Instead of abruptly switching between discrete views (e.g., from daily to weekly), the system continuously recalculates task positions and maintains visual continuity, allowing users to smoothly explore different time scales without mental discontinuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Adaptability or versatility

If tasks of multiple people are displayed in a single view, then the integration is improved, but the distinction between individual tasks becomes poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration of multi-user tasksVSAvoidtask ownership recognition
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality differentiation by assigning distinct visual characteristics (such as colors, icons, or labels) to tasks based on their assigned user. This allows tasks from different people to be displayed in a unified timeline view while maintaining clear local differentiation through these visual attributes, enabling users to easily distinguish task ownership without separating the views.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If different time horizon views are formatted differently, then the view-specific information is optimized, but the discontinuity between views increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveview-specific information accuracyVSAvoidview transition continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal display framework that maintains consistent formatting and layout principles across all time horizon views. Whether displaying hours, days, weeks, or months, the system uses the same fundamental display structure and task representation methods, ensuring continuity and reducing the need for users to mentally adjust to different formats when transitioning between time scales.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9514447B2Multi-horizon time wheel
Publication Date: 2016.12.06 DASSAULT SYSTEMS AMERICAS CORP
  • US9514447B2 patent drawing
  • US9514447B2 patent drawing
  • US9514447B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method includes storing a plurality of scheduled elements in a memory area, displaying a time horizon via a display device, and displaying a first portion of the plurality of scheduled elements within the time horizon. In response to a user input, the time horizon is adjusted and a second portion of the plurality of scheduled elements is displayed within the adjusted time horizon.