Multi-Ion Chain Quantum Computing for Scalable High-Fidelity Gates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quantum computing systems using trapped atomic ions face limitations in scalability due to increased heating rates and degraded gate fidelity as the number of ions in a single chain increases, limiting the number of qubits that can be effectively used.

Innovation Solution

A quantum computer architecture utilizing multiple independent ion chains in a single ion trap, where each chain has its own laser beams for parallel operations, allows for merging neighboring chains into a larger chain for inter-chain quantum gates through shuttling or rearrangement, and uses swap gates for non-neighboring chains, enabling arbitrary quantum computations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the number of ions in a single chain is increased to improve quantum computing capacity, then the number of qubits increases, but heating rates increase and gate fidelity degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of qubitsVSAvoidgate fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides a large number of ions into multiple separate chains, each containing a manageable number of ions (e.g., 5-20 ions per chain). This segmentation allows each chain to maintain low heating rates and high gate fidelity while the overall system achieves high quantum computing capacity through parallel operations across multiple chains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If multiple ion chains are used to increase qubit capacity, then scalability improves, but system complexity increases due to inter-chain operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of qubitsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically merges multiple ion chains into a single computational space when inter-chain quantum gates need to be performed. This merging is achieved through controlled shuttling that brings chains together, allowing the system to maintain simplicity during operations while preserving the scalability benefits of multiple chains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically reconfigures ion chains by shuttling them between separated and merged states based on computational requirements. During parallel operations, chains remain separated for simplicity; during inter-chain gates, chains are temporarily merged. This dynamic approach optimizes both scalability and operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If parallel operations are performed across multiple chains, then productivity increases, but coordination complexity increases for merging and shuttling operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation throughputVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic shuttling cycles that bring chains together for coordinated quantum gate operations and then separate them for parallel processing. This periodic pattern of merging and separating allows high productivity through parallel operations while managing coordination complexity through regular, predictable cycles rather than continuous complex coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances scalability by allowing parallel operations across multiple chains, mitigating heating issues and maintaining high gate fidelity, thereby increasing the number of usable qubits without degrading performance.

Implementation Method 1

Each chain can have its own set of laser beams with which to implement and operate quantum gates within that chain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 2

qubits based on trapped atomic ions are readily entangled with each other by modulating their Coulomb interaction with suitable external control fields

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoulomb interaction: Coulomb's Law

Implementation Method 3

The merging of separate chains may be accomplished by, for example, changing the voltage waveforms that are applied to the ion trap, a process referred to as shuttling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic field: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12482644B2Quantum computer based on manipulation of ion chains
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 IONQ INC
  • US12482644B2 patent drawing
  • US12482644B2 patent drawing
  • US12482644B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The use of multiple ion chains in a single ion trap for quantum information processing (QIP) systems is described. Each chain can have its own set of laser beams with which to implement and operate quantum gates within that chain, where each chain may therefore correspond to a single quantum computing register or core. Operations can be performed in parallel across all of these chains as they can be treated independently from each other. To implement and operate quantum gates between different chains, neighboring chains are merged into a single, larger chain, in which one can perform quantum gates between any of the ions in the larger chain. The combined chains can then be separated again by another shuttling event as needed. To implement and operate quantum gates between ions which do not occupy neighboring chains, swap gates can be used via a sequence of intervening chains.