Multi-Jet Gas Atomization for Fine Powder Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current gas atomization methods face inefficiencies in producing fine spherical particles with a narrow particle size distribution, particularly below 100 microns, and require high gas pressures and expensive gases, leading to increased production costs and poor particle morphology.

Innovation Solution

The use of a gas flow production system with parallel, isobaric gas flows emitted at an angle of 90±45 degrees to a melt flow, increasing collision surfaces and energy transfer, allowing for efficient production of fine particles with a narrow size distribution using lower pressures and inexpensive gases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional gas atomization methods are used, then particles can be produced, but the particle size distribution is wide and spherical morphology is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size distributionVSAvoidspherical morphology
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The single gas flow is segmented into multiple parallel gas flows (e.g., 3-10 jets) arranged in a array. Each jet independently atomizes the melt stream, creating multiple collision surfaces that produce more uniform and spherical particles with narrower size distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The atomization process transitions from a single-direction gas flow to a multi-dimensional array of parallel gas flows. The jets are arranged perpendicular to the melt stream, creating a two-dimensional array of collision points that improves particle morphology and size uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If high gas pressure is used to produce fine particles, then particle size can be reduced, but production cost increases due to expensive gases and high pressure requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle sizeVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multiple parallel gas jets operating at moderate pressures (e.g., 2-10 bar) instead of a single high-pressure jet. The cumulative effect of multiple jets at lower pressures achieves fine particle production (below 100 microns) with reduced cost and improved safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The atomization function is divided among multiple gas jets, each contributing to the overall particle size reduction. This segmentation allows the use of lower pressure per jet while achieving the same or better fine particle production compared to a single high-pressure jet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If single gas flow is used for atomization, then device complexity is low, but collision surface area is limited and atomization efficiency is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas flow configurationVSAvoidatomization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The single gas flow is divided into multiple parallel jets arranged in an array. This segmentation increases the total collision surface area between gas and melt, dramatically improving atomization efficiency and fine particle production without requiring complex equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple parallel gas jets are combined in a coordinated array, all acting simultaneously on the melt stream. The merged effect of multiple jets creates extensive collision surfaces that enhance atomization efficiency while maintaining relatively simple device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves high efficiency in producing particles with diameters less than 100 microns (99%), 50 microns (90%), and 20 microns (60%), with improved spherical morphology and reduced satellite particles, while reducing operating costs by using lower pressures and inexpensive gases.

Implementation Method 1

collision of at least some of the plurality of gas flows with the melt flow in the atomizing chamber disintegrate the melt flow to produce the powder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCollision: Impact Force

Implementation Method 2

the droplets may be solidified to produce a powder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Freezing

Data Source

PatentUS20240066594A1Device and method for powder production
Publication Date: 2024.02.29 BAYAT AMIRHOSSEIN
  • US20240066594A1 patent drawing
  • US20240066594A1 patent drawing
  • US20240066594A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with some embodiments herein, a method for producing a powder from a material is provided. The material may be melted in a melt furnace to produce a melted material. The melted material may be conducted through a melt nozzle to emit, from the melt nozzle, a melt flow traveling through an atomizing chamber. A plurality of gas flows may be emitted through a plurality of orifices of a gas flow production device towards the melt flow. Collision of at least some of the plurality of gas flows with the melt flow in the atomizing chamber disintegrate the melt flow to produce the powder.