Multi-Journey 3D Mapping for Calibration-Resilient Vehicle Localization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to create precise 3D maps for autonomous vehicles using crowdsourced data due to dynamic changes in road conditions and the need for expensive, calibrated equipment.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for building precise 3D maps using multi-journey data from multiple vehicles, incorporating multi-journey association and refinement to optimize 6 degrees of freedom landmark poses and camera parameters, utilizing spectral and hierarchical clustering to improve accuracy and resilience to calibration errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If crowdsourced data from multiple vehicles is used to create 3D maps, then map precision and adaptability are improved, but data complexity and processing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemap precisionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex multi-vehicle mapping problem into distinct processing stages: individual vehicle journey processing, data aggregation from multiple sources, and iterative refinement cycles. Each stage handles specific aspects of the data independently, making the overall complex system manageable and processable through modular operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic iterative refinement where map data is continuously updated and improved through multiple processing passes. The system dynamically adjusts by reprocessing data with refined parameters, allowing the mapping system to adapt and improve precision through repeated optimization cycles rather than static single-pass processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If multi-journey data from multiple vehicles is aggregated, then map accuracy and resilience to calibration errors are improved, but computational requirements and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemap accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary processing of individual vehicle journeys independently before aggregation, pre-computing and preparing data structures that can be efficiently combined. This preliminary organization of multi-vehicle data reduces the computational burden during the final integration and refinement stages, decreasing overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous iterative refinement where processing continues across multiple passes without complete re-computation. Each iteration builds upon previous results, maintaining and improving accuracy through continuous optimization rather than discrete restarts, thereby reducing total processing time while enhancing map reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Ease of manufacture

If expensive calibrated equipment is replaced with crowdsourced vehicle data, then system cost is reduced, but measurement precision and data quality may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem costVSAvoiddata quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges data from multiple independent vehicle sources to compensate for individual data quality limitations. By combining numerous lower-precision measurements from crowd-sourced vehicles through aggregation and iterative refinement, the system achieves map precision comparable to expensive calibrated equipment while dramatically reducing system costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where processed map data is continuously compared and refined against incoming multi-vehicle observations. This feedback loop identifies and corrects errors in crowd-sourced data, maintaining high measurement precision despite the use of lower-cost sensing equipment by constantly validating and adjusting results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12573208B2Systems and methods for mapping based on multi-journey data
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12573208B2 patent drawing
  • US12573208B2 patent drawing
  • US12573208B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method performed by an apparatus is described. The method includes receiving map data that is based on first image data, second image data, and a similarity metric. The first image data can be received from a first vehicle and represent an object. The second image data can be received from a second vehicle and represent the object. The similarity metric can be associated with the object represented in the first image data and the object represented in the second image data. The method can also include storing, by a vehicle, the received map data and localizing the vehicle based on the stored map data.