Multi-layer Authentication with Live Interaction and Risk Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current user authentication systems are vulnerable to fraudulent activities as they rely solely on provided information, which can be compromised or falsified, leading to unauthorized access and transactions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a multi-layer user authentication system that evaluates contextual information, such as geography and communication channel features, to trigger additional authentication layers, including live video sessions, and utilizes machine learning to generate risk scores for determining the legitimacy of user requests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional single-layer authentication is used, then the authentication process is simple and fast, but the system is vulnerable to fraudulent activities and unauthorized access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication securityVSAvoidauthentication process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication process is divided into multiple distinct layers: initial authentication based on provided information, contextual information collection and analysis, risk score generation, and conditional live interaction authentication. Each layer operates independently and contributes to the overall security assessment, allowing the system to maintain simplicity for low-risk cases while providing enhanced security for suspicious cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication system dynamically adjusts its complexity based on the risk score generated from contextual information analysis. For low-risk authentication requests, the system maintains a simple process. For high-risk requests, the system automatically triggers additional authentication layers including live video sessions and photo ID verification, making the complexity adaptive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If multiple authentication layers are implemented, then fraudulent transactions are reduced, but the authentication process time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidauthentication processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary contextual information collection and analysis during the initial authentication phase, gathering data about the user's location, device characteristics, communication patterns, and other relevant factors before the authentication decision is made. This preliminary assessment allows the system to quickly determine whether additional authentication layers are necessary, avoiding time-consuming processes for low-risk cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors authentication outcomes and fraud patterns, using this feedback to refine risk scoring algorithms and adjust authentication requirements. The contextual information collected during each authentication attempt is fed back into the system to improve future risk assessments, making the authentication process increasingly efficient and accurate over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If contextual information analysis is performed, then risk assessment accuracy is improved, but the computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk score accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs contextual information analysis selectively rather than universally. It collects and analyzes only the minimum necessary contextual data required to generate a meaningful risk score for each specific authentication request. The depth and breadth of contextual analysis are adjusted based on the apparent risk level, avoiding excessive computational resources being consumed for low-risk cases while maintaining high accuracy for suspicious cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11695746B2Multi-layer user authentication with live interaction
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US11695746B2 patent drawing
  • US11695746B2 patent drawing
  • US11695746B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques for multi-layer user authentication with live interaction are described herein. An authentication request may be received from a user for secure data stored in a computing system. Contextual data may be received that is associated with authentication information received from the user. It may be determined that the user has passed a first authentication process based on a match between the authentication information and reference authentication information stored in a user profile for the user. A risk score may be generated for the authentication request based on the contextual data and the authentication data. A second authentication process may be identified based on the risk score. A set of secondary authentication information may be received. Data associated with the authentication request may be transmitted upon authentication of the user via the second authentication process based on the set of secondary authentication data.