Multi-layer core golf ball with hardness gradient

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing golf ball designs with multi-layer cores lack optimal hardness gradients and material compositions that balance compression, spin rate, and initial velocity, leading to suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

A golf ball design featuring a core with a center, intermediate core layer, and outer core layer, where each layer has specific hardness and thickness ranges, and is composed of rubber and non-rubber materials, including diene rubbers and ionomers, to achieve a desired hardness gradient and compression.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a multi-layer core structure is used, then compression and spin rate are improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance consistencyVSAvoidcore structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The core is divided into three distinct layers (center, intermediate core layer, and outer core layer) with different hardness values and material compositions. This segmentation allows each layer to contribute differently to the overall performance, with the softer center reducing spin and the harder outer layer enhancing initial velocity, thereby improving performance consistency through optimized functional zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the core have different material properties: the center has lower hardness (softer) to reduce spin rate, while the outer core layer has higher hardness to increase initial velocity. This local differentiation of material properties within the core structure optimizes performance by tailoring each region's characteristics to specific functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Speed

If the center hardness is increased, then initial velocity is improved, but spin rate control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial velocityVSAvoidspin rate control
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The center region is designed with softer hardness compared to the outer core layer. This local softness in the center region helps control spin rate by providing a more compliant impact surface, while the harder outer layer (with higher hardness) compensates to maintain high initial velocity. The gradient from softer center to harder outer layer balances spin control and velocity generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Speed

If the outer core layer hardness is increased, then initial velocity is improved, but compression characteristics worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial velocityVSAvoidcompression characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The outer core layer is designed with higher hardness to maximize initial velocity through efficient energy transfer at impact. However, the intermediate core layer is designed with lower hardness to maintain favorable compression characteristics, allowing the ball to compress adequately during impact. This creates a hardness gradient where the outer layer optimizes velocity while the inner layers preserve compression properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If a softer intermediate core layer is used, then spin rate is reduced, but structural integrity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespin rate controlVSAvoidcore structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The intermediate core layer is designed with softer material properties to reduce spin rate by providing a compliant transition zone between the center and outer layer. However, this softer layer is surrounded by harder outer core layers that provide structural reinforcement, preventing the softer intermediate layer from compromising overall structural integrity. The harder outer layers act as a protective shell for the softer internal structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The core utilizes composite material construction with at least two different materials having different hardness values distributed across the layers. This composite structure allows the softer intermediate layer to fulfill its spin-reducing function while the harder outer layers provide the necessary structural strength and integrity to maintain core stability during impact and flight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS9737766B2Multi-layer core golf ball
Publication Date: 2017.08.22 ACUSHNET CO
  • US9737766B2 patent drawing
  • US9737766B2 patent drawing
  • US9737766B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Golf balls comprising a multi-layer core and a cover are disclosed. The multi-layer core comprises a zero or positive hardness gradient center that is hard relative to an intermediate core layer.