Multi-layer Lithographic Target with Symmetric Sub-patterns
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional target systems for determining alignment and overlay errors in lithographic processes are inefficient in terms of wafer surface area usage and do not minimize proximity effects, requiring multiple targets and complex calibration across multiple layers.
Innovation Solution
A multi-level lithographic target system with symmetric sub-patterns about a common center, allowing for efficient use of the metrology tool's field of view and minimizing asymmetric proximity effects, enabling simultaneous measurement of alignment and overlay errors across multiple layers using a common metrology recipe and sampling.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Area of stationary object
If conventional nested box or frame targets are used on successive lithographic layers, then alignment and overlay measurement can be performed, but the targets make inefficient use of wafer surface area and require multiple targets
Solution Approach 1:
The patent combines multiple layer measurements into a single target structure. The target includes sub-patterns from multiple lithographic layers (first layer sub-patterns and second layer sub-patterns) arranged in a compact configuration, allowing simultaneous measurement of overlay between layers A-B and B-C within one target footprint, thereby reducing the number of separate targets needed and improving wafer surface area utilization.
Solution Approach 2:
The target design nests sub-patterns from different layers within a hierarchical structure. The first and second layer sub-patterns are positioned relative to each other within the same target field, with each layer's sub-patterns nested within the overall target geometry. This nested arrangement allows multiple layer measurements to coexist in a compact space, reducing the area required compared to conventional separate targets.
2Manufacturing precision
If conventional targets are used, then overlay measurement can be performed, but asymmetric proximity effects are not minimized
Solution Approach 1:
The patent employs asymmetric target designs where sub-patterns from different layers are intentionally positioned at different locations within the target field. The first layer sub-patterns and second layer sub-patterns are arranged asymmetrically relative to each other, which helps minimize asymmetric proximity effects by distributing the measurement features in a configuration that reduces mutual interference and optical aberrations during metrology measurement.
3Adaptability or versatility
If multiple targets are used for multi-layer alignment, then comprehensive coverage can be achieved, but metrology tool recipes and sampling complexity increase
Solution Approach 1:
The single multi-layer target serves multiple measurement functions simultaneously. It enables overlay measurement between layer A and B, between layer B and C, and potentially between other layer combinations, all within one target structure. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for separate metrology recipes for each target, simplifying the measurement process while maintaining comprehensive multi-layer coverage.
Data Source
AI summary
A target system for determining positioning error between lithographically produced integrated circuit fields on at least one lithographic level. The target system includes a first target pattern on a lithographic field containing an integrated circuit pattern, with the first target pattern comprising a plurality of sub-patterns symmetric about a first target pattern center and at a same first distance from the first target pattern center. The target system also includes a second target pattern on a different lithographic field, with the second target pattern comprising a plurality of sub-patterns symmetric about a second target pattern center and at a same second distance from the second target pattern center. The second target pattern center is intended to be at the same location as the first target pattern center. The centers of the first and second target patterns may be determined and compared to determine positioning error between the lithographic fields.


