Multi-Layer Snare Barrier with Variable Netting Holes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current barriers fail to effectively deter and capture snakes and rodents of varying sizes while minimizing visual impact on the surroundings.

Innovation Solution

A land animal snare barrier system comprising multiple layers of netting with varying hole sizes, attached to vertical and ground supports, designed to entangle and trap snakes and rodents, with optional translucent material for low visibility and integrated sensors for alerting mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single layer of netting with uniform hole size is used, then the barrier structure is simple, but it cannot effectively trap snakes and rodents of varying sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to trap different sized animalsVSAvoidnetting structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The netting barrier is segmented into multiple layers, each with different hole sizes. The first layer has larger holes (e.g., 1 inch) to accommodate larger snakes, while subsequent layers have progressively smaller holes (e.g., 3/4 inch, 1/2 inch, 1/4 inch) to trap smaller snakes and rodents. This segmentation allows the barrier to effectively capture animals of varying sizes without requiring a completely different barrier for each animal type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the netting barrier have different hole sizes tailored to specific functions. The first layer with larger holes is positioned to intercept larger animals, while inner layers with smaller holes are positioned to trap smaller animals that pass through the outer layers. This local differentiation of hole sizes optimizes the trapping effectiveness for each animal size category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If opaque barrier material is used, then the barrier is highly visible and easily detected, but it has significant visual impact on the surroundings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual impact on surroundingsVSAvoiddetection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The netting material is made translucent rather than opaque, allowing it to blend with the surrounding environment. The translucent quality reduces visual impact by permitting light transmission and background visibility, making the barrier less obtrusive while maintaining structural integrity and detection capability through tactile and visual cues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If larger hole sizes are used in netting, then larger animals can pass through, but smaller animals cannot be effectively trapped

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to trap small animalsVSAvoidhole size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier is divided into multiple netting layers with progressively smaller hole sizes. The first layer has larger holes to allow smaller animals to pass through to inner layers, while the cumulative effect of multiple layers with decreasing hole sizes ensures that animals of all sizes are eventually trapped. This segmented approach solves the problem of selecting appropriate hole sizes for different animal dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple layers of netting with different hole sizes are used, then snakes and rodents of all sizes can be trapped, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to trap all sized animalsVSAvoidmulti-layer netting structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple netting layers with different hole sizes are merged into a single integrated barrier system. The layers are positioned sequentially with the first layer having larger holes and subsequent layers having smaller holes, creating a unified structure that traps animals of all sizes. This merging approach consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate barriers into one cohesive system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10694735B2Land animal trap and barrier
Publication Date: 2020.06.30 ROMANO CHRIS
  • US10694735B2 patent drawing
  • US10694735B2 patent drawing
  • US10694735B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A land animal snare barrier comprising a netting having a first layer and a second layer. The first layer defines a first plurality of through holes of a first size. The second layer defines a second plurality of through holes of a second size.