Multi-Physical Layer Wireless Node for Interference Resilience

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems are inadequate in ensuring ultra-high reliability due to environmental and intentional interference, intermittent connectivity, and physical barriers, particularly in critical applications like high-security and emergency operations.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a robust wireless communication system using multiple nodes that actively manage multiple physical layers to select the most reliable communication paths, ensuring uninterrupted connectivity through processors that manage data over concurrent links, supporting various communication systems like RF, optical, and acoustic, and allowing for scalable and adaptable network architecture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single physical layer is used for wireless communication, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to environmental interference, intentional jamming, and physical barriers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the communication channel into multiple physical layers (e.g., RF, optical, acoustic) that operate independently. Each layer can be selectively activated based on environmental conditions, allowing the system to maintain reliable communication by switching to unaffected layers when interference occurs on any single layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The communication node is designed with multi-functionality by integrating multiple physical layer interfaces (RF transceiver, optical transceiver, acoustic transceiver) into a single universal communication device. This allows the same node to operate across different physical media, enhancing reliability without proportionally increasing overall system complexity through shared processing architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple physical layers are managed concurrently, then communication reliability is improved through path diversity, but device complexity increases due to multiple interfaces and processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnectivity reliabilityVSAvoidnode complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the control and processing functions for multiple physical layers into a unified architecture within each node. The processor coordinates all physical layer interfaces, manages path selection, and handles data routing across layers, reducing the complexity overhead that would result from separate independent systems for each layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects and activates only the necessary physical layers based on real-time environmental conditions and communication requirements. Rather than permanently maintaining all interfaces in an active state, the system adapts its configuration, reducing complexity when full multi-layer capability is not needed while maintaining reliability when conditions require it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If processors manage data over multiple concurrent links, then data dropout is eliminated, but energy consumption increases due to continuous monitoring and management of multiple paths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission reliabilityVSAvoidnode energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The processor manages multiple concurrent links but activates full monitoring and data transmission only on the necessary subset of active paths. Rather than continuously maximizing all available links, the system uses partial action by selectively engaging only the minimum required number of paths to maintain reliability, thereby reducing energy consumption while preventing data dropout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If the system selects communication paths based on reliability determination, then communication robustness is improved, but processing time increases due to continuous reliability assessment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication robustnessVSAvoidpath selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary reliability assessments and establishes backup communication paths in advance before interference occurs. By pre-evaluating the reliability of multiple potential paths and having fallback routes ready, the system reduces the time required for path selection during actual communication, as the decision logic is already prepared rather than requiring real-time analysis when interference is detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11540198B2Ultra-high reliability wireless communication systems and methods
Publication Date: 2022.12.27 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA LLC
  • US11540198B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for ultra-high reliability (UHR) wireless communications systems and methods are disclosed. The disclosed UHR wireless communications systems and methods make the networked components on a communications infrastructure robust to interference caused by unintentional jamming, intermittent connectivity, weather, and physical barriers.