Multi-Level AI Supercomputer Architecture for Specialized LLM Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current AI generative models and large language models (LLMs) require significant supercomputing efforts to improve response times, accuracies, and reduce computational load, limiting their scalability and expandability.

Innovation Solution

A multi-level generative AI system utilizing derived requests, multiple h-LLMs with varying levels of accuracy, and a distributed architecture to efficiently process and refine tasks through techniques like bagging, boosting, and merging/fusing h-LLMs, along with a local database for future request categorization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional machine learning algorithms are used for content analysis, then computational resources are consumed, but they cannot generate content efficiently like generative AI

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent generation efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the generative AI workload into multiple specialized h-LLMs (h-LLM-1, h-LLM-2, h-LLM-3) that can be independently executed and combined. Each h-LLM handles specific aspects of content generation, allowing parallel processing and reducing the computational burden on any single model while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges results from multiple h-LLMs through a combination module that integrates their outputs into a final generated content. This combining approach leverages the strengths of each specialized model while distributing the computational load, achieving efficient content generation without concentrating all computational resources in one system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If a single large language model is used to handle all requests, then simplicity is maintained, but response time and accuracy suffer under heavy workload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse accuracyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The workload is segmented across multiple h-LLMs with specialized functions. The system divides incoming requests and routes them to appropriate h-LLMs based on the task type, enabling parallel processing that reduces response time while maintaining accuracy through specialized model expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the combination module evaluates results from multiple h-LLMs and can request reprocessing or refinement. This feedback loop ensures high accuracy by allowing the system to iterate on responses until the desired quality level is achieved, while the parallel architecture maintains efficient response times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If multiple h-LLMs are deployed with varying accuracy levels, then workload distribution is optimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload processing efficiencyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments h-LLMs into distinct accuracy levels (h-LLM-1, h-LLM-2, h-LLM-3) with each handling specific workload types. This segmentation allows the routing module to efficiently distribute requests based on complexity and required accuracy, optimizing productivity while maintaining manageable system architecture through clear functional separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The combination module serves multiple functions: it aggregates results from different h-LLMs, evaluates their quality, performs refinement if needed, and manages the feedback loop. This multi-functional component handles the complexity of coordinating multiple specialized models, allowing the overall system to achieve high productivity without proportionally increasing architectural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If computational resources are increased to improve LLM performance, then accuracy and response time improve, but scalability is limited by resource availability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the AI workload into multiple independent h-LLMs that can be scaled individually based on demand. This segmentation allows the system to allocate computational resources efficiently across multiple models rather than concentrating all resources in a single system, improving both accuracy and scalability by allowing incremental addition of modeling capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines results from multiple h-LLMs to achieve high accuracy without requiring any single model to consume excessive computational resources. This merging approach allows the system to scale by adding more specialized models rather than continuously increasing the size and resource requirements of a single monolithic model, thereby improving both accuracy and scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12399920B2Method and system for multi-level artificial intelligence supercomputer design featuring sequencing of large language models
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 MADISETTI VIJAY
  • US12399920B2 patent drawing
  • US12399920B2 patent drawing
  • US12399920B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for assigning tasks to LLMs using h-including receiving documents relevant to embeddings, generating context-aware prompts responsive to at least one of a received prompt, derived prompts, and the received knowledge documents, each context-aware prompt corresponding to a specialized task of the one or more specialized tasks, transmitting each context-aware prompt to a respective h- that is configured to specialize in processing prompts having a specialty corresponding to the specialized task of the context-aware prompt, and receiving results from the h-LLMs.