Multi-Level Ensemble Classifiers for Proactive Malicious Domain Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cybersecurity approaches are reactive and struggle to timely address constantly changing security vulnerabilities, attack vectors, and bad actor profiles, making it difficult for human security analysts to effectively predict and mitigate cybersecurity threats.

Innovation Solution

The Enhanced Predictive Security System (EPSS) employs a domain-centric approach combined with advanced machine learning algorithms and a multi-level machine learning architecture to predict malicious domains associated with bad actors before they are known to be malicious.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If reactive cybersecurity approaches (blocklists, firewalls) are used, then known threats are blocked, but damage has already occurred and new threats cannot be predicted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat mitigation effectivenessVSAvoidresponse time to threats
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of domains into benign and suspicious categories using machine learning models before malicious activity occurs. By analyzing domain characteristics, registration patterns, and behavioral features in advance, the system identifies potentially malicious domains proactively, enabling preventive action rather than reactive response after damage occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic, adaptive machine learning models that continuously learn from new threat patterns and update their classification capabilities. Unlike static blocklists, these models adapt to evolving attack vectors and bad actor profiles, maintaining effectiveness against both known and emerging threats through continuous retraining and parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If human security analysts manually assess threats, then detailed analysis is possible, but it becomes impossible to timely address all security vulnerabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat analysis accuracyVSAvoidthreat assessment throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated machine learning models that independently perform threat classification, domain evaluation, and risk assessment without requiring human intervention for each case. The models self-adjust parameters, automatically train on new data, and generate classifications autonomously, enabling high-volume processing while maintaining consistent analytical quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual human analysis with automated machine learning algorithms that process threat data at scale. These algorithms substitute human cognitive processes with computational models capable of analyzing numerous domains simultaneously, maintaining analytical precision while increasing throughput by orders of magnitude through parallel processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If single-level machine learning classifiers are used, then the system is simple, but accuracy in predicting malicious domains is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassifier architectureVSAvoidmalicious domain prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the classification task into multiple hierarchical levels, with different classifiers handling specific aspects of domain evaluation. Each level focuses on particular features or threat types, allowing specialized analysis at each stage while maintaining overall system manageability through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple classifier outputs through ensemble methods, merging predictions from different machine learning models to produce a final classification decision. This integration of multiple classification perspectives enhances prediction accuracy by leveraging complementary strengths of individual models while reducing individual model biases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12346801B2Multi-level ensemble classifiers for cybersecurity machine learning applications
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 DOMAINTOOLS LLC
  • US12346801B2 patent drawing
  • US12346801B2 patent drawing
  • US12346801B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and techniques for producing and using enhanced machine learning models and computer-implemented tools to investigate cybersecurity related data and threat intelligence data are provided. Example embodiments provide an Enhanced Predictive Security System, for building, deploying, and managing applications for evaluating threat intelligence data that can predict malicious domains associated with bad actors before the domains are known to be malicious. In one example, the EPSS comprises one or more components that work together to provide an architecture and a framework for building and deploying cybersecurity threat analysis application, including machine learning algorithms, feature class engines, tuning systems, ensemble classifier engines, and validation and testing engines. These components cooperate and act upon domain data and feature class vectors to create sampled test, training, and validation data and to build model subsets and applications using a trained model library, which stores definitions of each model subset for easy re-instantiation.