Multi-Level Hazard Detection System Using Modular Sensor Arrays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current environmental monitoring systems lack the ability to efficiently detect various hazards such as termites, rodents, moles, radon gas, and refrigerator malfunctions in a comprehensive and user-friendly manner, particularly in residential and industrial settings, and do not allow for easy upgrading or data collection for policy-making purposes.

Innovation Solution

A multi-level hazard detection system comprising a Single or Multi Sensor Device with a Low Power Communication Module, a Monitor and Control Device, an Analytic Server, and a Relay Dongle, which uses sensors to detect changes in the environment and transmit data for processing, applying algorithms to identify hazards like termites, rodents, and refrigerator issues, and allowing for modular upgrades.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a comprehensive hazard detection system is implemented to detect multiple hazards (termites, rodents, radon, refrigerator issues), then the detection capability and safety monitoring are improved, but the device complexity and system cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-functional sensor device that can detect multiple different hazards using various sensors (acoustic sensors for termites and rodents, gas sensors for radon, temperature sensors for refrigerator monitoring). This single device performs multiple detection functions simultaneously, resolving the contradiction by improving comprehensive hazard detection capability while avoiding the need for multiple separate detection systems that would increase complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is divided into modular components including sensor devices, communication modules, and a central monitoring system. Each component has a specific function, and they work together through standardized interfaces. This segmentation allows the system to be comprehensive in capability while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of time

If real-time monitoring and alerting system is implemented, then the response time to hazards is improved, but the energy consumption and operational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard response timeVSAvoidsystem energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic sensing and selective alerting rather than continuous high-power operation. Sensors take measurements at intervals, and the system only activates full alerting and notification functions when hazards are detected. This periodic operation mode maintains real-time monitoring capability while significantly reducing average energy consumption compared to continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors conditions and triggers alerts only when necessary, without requiring constant user intervention or continuous high-power operation. The intelligent processing and selective alerting enable the system to manage its own operation efficiently, reducing energy consumption while maintaining rapid response capability when hazards occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system is made modular and upgradable, then the adaptability and future-proofing are improved, but the device complexity and integration difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem upgradabilityVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed with modular components including sensor devices, communication modules, and processing units that can be independently selected and configured. This segmentation enables easy upgradability - new sensors or features can be added by simply integrating additional modular components through standardized interfaces, improving adaptability while managing complexity through clear module boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular architecture uses universal communication protocols and standardized interfaces across different components. This universality allows different sensor types and system configurations to work together seamlessly, enabling the system to be upgraded and adapted to new hazards or requirements without redesigning the entire system, thus improving versatility while keeping integration manageable through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9424731B2Multi level hazard detection system
Publication Date: 2016.08.23 KORAKIN YOSEF
  • US9424731B2 patent drawing
  • US9424731B2 patent drawing
  • US9424731B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi level hazard detection system for home residents or owners or service providers that want to efficiently monitor and detect numerous common hazards in houses, offices or industrial structures. Hazards that may be dangerous their health or to the structural integrity of their houses, offices and industrial structures and all appliances and systems that are of these structures such as heating and cooling systems, pipes and more. By detecting hazards in advance, residents home owners and service providers can better protect their property. The multi level hazard detection system generally includes Single or Multi Sensor Device (170) that can be based on Low Power Communication Module (110), A Monitor and Control Device (140) which can be a mobile phone, desktop or laptop computer, an Analytic Server (150) and Relay Dongle (160).