Multi-link Motorcycle Suspension with Ball Joints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current motorcycle suspension systems, particularly those with telescopic forks, face issues such as diving under braking and sliding friction in bushings, leading to suboptimal performance and handling.

Innovation Solution

A suspension system featuring a wheel carrier with locating arms and ball joints, along with telescoping spring damper units and a steering shaft with universal joints, which allows for independent suspension and steering motion, improving handling and performance by distributing load and motion effectively across the frame.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a telescopic fork is used in the steering system, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the system experiences diving under braking and sliding friction in the bushings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The steering system is divided into separate functional components: a steering assembly that rotates independently and a suspension assembly that handles vertical motion. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, eliminating the diving problem caused by the integrated telescopic fork while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through modular assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static telescopic fork structure to a dynamic multi-link suspension system where the locating arms and ball joints allow independent rotation and suspension motion. This dynamic configuration enables the steering to rotate without being constrained by suspension movement, eliminating sliding friction in bushings while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a telescopic fork is used, then the structure is simple, but the handling and performance are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidhandling
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By separating steering and suspension functions into distinct assemblies, the system achieves better handling performance despite increased component count. The steering assembly can rotate independently without being affected by suspension motion, providing superior handling characteristics compared to the integrated telescopic fork.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the geometric parameters of the suspension linkage (locating arm lengths, ball joint positions) to optimize handling characteristics. The multi-link configuration allows for adjustable track width and suspension geometry, improving handling and performance beyond what is achievable with a fixed telescopic fork design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the locating arms are positioned with rearward ends spaced horizontally outward at greater distance from the medial plane, then the steering response is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering responseVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locating arms are positioned asymmetrically with rearward ends spaced horizontally outward at greater distances from the medial plane compared to the forward ends. This asymmetric configuration optimizes steering response by creating a more favorable steering geometry, and the complexity is managed through symmetrical pairing of left and right arms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The locating arms extend in multiple dimensions with both horizontal and vertical spacing between forward and rearward ends. This three-dimensional configuration allows for optimized steering response through adjusted geometry while maintaining a compact overall structure that manages complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances handling and performance by allowing simultaneous suspension and steering motion, reducing the tendency to dive under braking and minimizing sliding friction, resulting in improved stability and control.

Implementation Method 1

telescoping spring damper units

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

telescoping spring damper units

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Implementation Method 3

forward ball joint connecting the forward end of the locating arms with the wheel carrier, and a rearward ball joint connecting the rearward end of the locating arm with the frame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpherical joint rotation: Ball

Implementation Method 4

steering shaft with universal joints

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUniversal joint: Gimbal

Data Source

PatentUS10967930B2Multi-link suspension system
Publication Date: 2021.04.06 MINAKER BRUCE
  • US10967930B2 patent drawing
  • US10967930B2 patent drawing
  • US10967930B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A suspension system for a vehicle having a frame with a medial plane and a wheel defining a central plane. The suspension system comprises a wheel carrier rotatably connectable with the wheel and operably connected to the handle bar assembly for transferring steering motion from the handle bar assembly to the wheel, a steering shaft configured to transmit steering motion from the handle bar assembly to the wheel carrier, a plurality of locating arms, each of the plurality of locating arms having a forward end and a rearward end, a forward ball joint connecting the forward end of each of the plurality of locating arms with the wheel carrier and a rearward ball joint connecting the rearward end of each of the plurality of locating arms with the frame.