Multi-link Suspension Decoupling Damper for Camber Gain

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

MacPherson strut suspension systems limit the range of motion and camber gain in high-performance vehicle applications, failing to maximize handling potential and vehicle stability.

Innovation Solution

A multi-link suspension system is introduced, decoupling the damper from the upright and adding upper links to enhance camber and roll characteristics, while retaining the shock absorber and spring in their original locations, allowing for increased angular displacement and improved vehicle dynamics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a MacPherson strut arrangement is used, then a compact suspension arrangement is achieved, but the range of motion and camber gain are insufficient for high performance applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension arrangement compactnessVSAvoidrange of motion and camber gain
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The MacPherson strut assembly is segmented into separate functional components: the shock absorber remains integrated with the strut, while the spring is separated and mounted independently on the upper control arm. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, enabling greater range of motion and camber gain while maintaining compact overall packaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spring mounting location is moved from the traditional vertical strut position to the upper control arm, representing a dimensional change in the suspension architecture. This repositioning allows the spring to accommodate larger angular displacements and camber changes while the shock absorber maintains its vertical orientation for compact packaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If the MacPherson strut arrangement is used, then structural simplicity is maintained, but handling potential and vehicle stability are not maximized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrut arrangement simplicityVSAvoidhandling performance and stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the suspension system into separate shock absorber and spring assemblies with independent mounting locations, the system achieves MacPherson-like simplicity while incorporating multi-link characteristics that improve handling performance and vehicle stability through enhanced camber gain and range of motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modified arrangement combines the simplicity of the MacPherson strut with the performance characteristics of multi-link suspension systems. The shock absorber maintains vertical mounting for compactness while the independently mounted spring on the upper control arm provides enhanced camber gain, creating a hybrid system that delivers both simplicity and high-performance handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10639954B2Multi-link suspension system
Publication Date: 2020.05.05 OCONNELL JAY
  • US10639954B2 patent drawing
  • US10639954B2 patent drawing
  • US10639954B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-link suspension system that can be used to modify a MacPherson strut suspension system is described.