Multi-Link TID Mapping Updates Without Response Negotiation

The patent applies partial action by implementing selective response mechanisms where the receiving device only responds to indication messages when necessary. Instead of requiring responses for all mapping update scenarios, the system determines whether a response is needed based on specific conditions (e.g., whether the indication message contains valid updates, whether the receiver is in a state that requires confirmation), thereby reducing signaling overhead while maintaining mapping reliability for critical cases

The patent changes the parameter of response requirement from a fixed state to a dynamic state. The indication message includes parameters that indicate whether a response is expected or required, allowing the system to adapt the negotiation process based on the specific update scenario. This parameter change enables the system to switch between full negotiation mode (high reliability) and unidirectional update mode (low overhead) depending on conditions

The patent implements partial action by requiring responses only for specific types of indication messages or under specific conditions. For example, when the indication message contains significant mapping changes or when the receiver is in a state that requires confirmation, a response is mandated. For other scenarios (e.g., minor updates, redundant information), the system operates in unidirectional mode without requiring responses, thereby improving communication efficiency while maintaining reliability for critical operations

The patent segments the indication message types and response requirements into different categories. Different types of mapping updates are classified into groups that require different levels of negotiation. This segmentation allows the system to apply appropriate response requirements to each category, optimizing the balance between reliability and efficiency for different operational scenarios

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing rules and criteria for when responses are required versus when unidirectional updates suffice. The system pre-defines conditions under which mapping updates should be confirmed and scenarios where they can be applied immediately without negotiation. This preliminary setup reduces the need for real-time negotiation decisions, thereby reducing processing time while maintaining mapping consistency through pre-agreed protocols

The patent implements partial negotiation by requiring full negotiation protocols only when necessary for ensuring consistency (e.g., initial mapping establishment, critical updates). For routine or minor updates, the system uses simplified unidirectional communication, reducing processing time while maintaining sufficient consistency. This selective approach avoids the time overhead of full negotiation for all scenarios