Multi-Material Additive Attachment Structure for Crack-Resistant Tooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional additive manufacturing processes face challenges in creating tooling with high carbon content, as they are prone to cracking due to high carbon levels, and existing methods struggle to achieve the necessary hardness and durability while maintaining structural integrity.

Innovation Solution

The use of an additive manufacturing system with an electrode head featuring multiple electrodes of varying ductility and hardness, allowing for controlled deposition of materials to form parts with distinct interior and exterior properties, including a transition zone that blends materials to reduce stress and enhance durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If high carbon content material is used to create hard tooling, then hardness and wear resistance are improved, but the material becomes brittle and prone to cracking

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehardnessVSAvoidcrack resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a tooling structure with non-uniform material composition - the exterior surface contains high carbon content for hardness and wear resistance, while the interior contains lower carbon content for ductility and crack resistance. This gradient structure allows each region to have the specific properties needed for its function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by combining different carbon content regions within a single tooling component. The multi-material approach creates a composite structure where hard high-carbon exterior material is integrated with more ductile low-carbon interior material, achieving both hardness and crack resistance in the overall component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Device complexity

If traditional single-material additive manufacturing is used, then process simplicity is maintained, but the ability to create parts with different mechanical properties in different regions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidmaterial property variation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by enabling different material compositions to be deposited in different regions of the part during the additive manufacturing process. The system can switch between materials with different carbon contents based on the current deposition location, allowing tailored mechanical properties for different functional regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the material selection process dynamic and adaptive during manufacturing. Rather than using a fixed single material throughout, the system dynamically adjusts material composition based on real-time requirements of different part regions, enabling versatile property variation while maintaining process integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the creation of tooling with reduced crack propagation and improved durability by utilizing a combination of ductile and hard materials, allowing for efficient production of parts that can withstand various manufacturing processes and environmental conditions.

Implementation Method 1

an electrode head comprising an array of multiple electrodes for depositing material layer by layer to form a three-dimensional (3D) attachment structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

depositing material layer by layer to form a three-dimensional (3D) attachment structure connecting first and second prefabricated metallic parts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Freezing

Implementation Method 3

A power source is configured to provide power for heating each electrode of the array of multiple electrodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11229953B2Methods and systems for additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2022.01.25 LINCOLN GLOBAL INC
  • US11229953B2 patent drawing
  • US11229953B2 patent drawing
  • US11229953B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An additive manufacturing system includes an electrode head comprising an array of electrodes for depositing material to form a three-dimensional attachment structure connecting first and second prefabricated metallic parts. The array includes a first plurality of electrodes formed from a first metallic material having a first ductility and a first hardness, and a second plurality of electrodes formed from a second metallic material having a second ductility and a second hardness, wherein the first ductility is greater than the second ductility and the second hardness is greater than the first hardness. A power source provides power for heating each electrode. A drive roll system drives each electrode. A controller is connected to the power source to control operations of the additive manufacturing system to form an interior portion of the attachment structure using the first plurality of electrodes, and control the operations of the additive manufacturing system to form an exterior portion of the attachment structure using the second plurality of electrodes, such that ductility of the interior portion of the attachment structure is greater than ductility of the exterior portion of the attachment structure.