Multi-Metal Zeolite Catalyst for NOx Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for reducing nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from combustion processes in the petroleum and petrochemical industry are expensive and have limited efficiency, necessitating the development of more effective selective catalytic reduction techniques.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing zeolite catalysts loaded with a combination of tungsten, cobalt, and vanadium metals, specifically 6 wt.% cobalt or vanadium and 4 wt.% tungsten, to catalytically reduce NOx in exhaust streams using ammonia as a reductant, with operating conditions between 250 °C and 400 °C and a GHSV of 30000 to 120000 h^-1, within a catalytic reactor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional SCR methods using single-metal catalysts are used, then the system is simpler and less expensive, but the NOx reduction efficiency is limited and operating costs are high

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx reduction efficiencyVSAvoidcatalyst composition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining multiple metals (tungsten, cobalt, and/or vanadium) loaded on zeolite catalysts to create a synergistic catalytic system. This composite catalyst structure achieves superior NOx reduction efficiency (>90%) compared to single-metal catalysts, while the zeolite support provides structural stability and cost-effectiveness, thus resolving the contradiction between efficiency and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple metal components (tungsten, cobalt, vanadium) into a single catalyst system loaded on zeolite. This combination allows the catalyst to utilize different metal sites for various catalytic functions, achieving high NOx reduction efficiency while maintaining a unified catalyst structure that simplifies operation compared to multiple separate catalyst beds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If conventional SCR methods are used, then the system is easier to operate, but the NOx reduction capacity is limited and costs are high

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx reduction capacityVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes operational parameters by operating the multi-metal zeolite catalyst in the temperature range of 250-400°C, which enhances NOx reduction capacity while maintaining ease of operation. The optimized GHSV (30,000-120,000 h^-1) and ammonia-to-NOx molar ratio (1:1) further improve capacity without complicating operation, as these parameters can be controlled using standard SCR system controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If higher metal loading is used to improve NOx reduction efficiency, then the catalyst activity increases, but the cost of the catalyst increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst activityVSAvoidmetal loading cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by strategically distributing different metals (tungsten, cobalt, vanadium) at specific loadings (6 wt.% for cobalt or vanadium, 4 wt.% for tungsten) on the zeolite support. This localized metal distribution optimizes catalytic activity at active sites while minimizing overall metal content and cost. The zeolite support provides high surface area for dispersion, ensuring high catalyst activity without requiring excessive metal loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves NOx reduction efficiencies of greater than 90%, effectively addressing the limitations of existing technologies by providing a cost-effective and efficient method for NOx reduction in combustion exhaust streams.

Implementation Method 1

a catalytic reactor that includes at least one zeolite catalyst loaded with at least two metals to reduce the amount of NOx in the exhaust stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

SCR is a catalytic technique to convert NOx to diatomic nitrogen, N2, and water, H2O

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective catalytic reduction: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

SCR is a catalytic technique to convert NOx to diatomic nitrogen, N2, and water, H2O. Typically, a fluid reductant-such as anhydrous ammonia, aqueous ammonia or urea-is added to a stream of exhaust gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRedox reactions: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 4

The catalytic reactor is configured to receive at least a portion of the exhaust stream and the reductant stream at suitable operating conditions to reduce the amount of NOx in the stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy: Heating

Data Source

PatentEP2882520B1Catalytic reduction of NOX with high activity catalysts with NH3 reductant
Publication Date: 2020.03.11 EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO
  • EP2882520B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2882520B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2882520B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods and systems for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with an ammonia reductant and a zeolite catalyst loaded with at least two metals selected from the group of tungsten, cobalt, and vanadium. An exhaust stream including NOx and a reductant stream including ammonia are provided to a catalytic reactor having the metal loaded zeolite catalyst at suitable operating temperatures for NOx reduction of at least 90%.