Multi-Modal Asset Evaluation for Personalized Neural Value Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional asset search and valuation systems are limited by a price-centric focus, lack of personalization, inadequate data integration, insufficient scalability, and failure to consider environmental and contextual factors, leading to sub-optimal recommendations and missed opportunities for high-value assets.

Innovation Solution

An AI-driven asset evaluation system that integrates multi-modal data analysis using neural networks and personalization engines to predict value scores tailored to individual user profiles, employing a distributed processing architecture for real-time and scalable evaluations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional price-centric valuation systems are used, then simplicity and ease of operation are maintained, but measurement precision and reliability of asset valuation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveasset valuation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The asset evaluation system is segmented into multiple specialized AI models including computer vision models for image analysis, NLP models for text processing, and separate processing modules for different data types. Each segment handles specific aspects of asset evaluation, allowing the system to achieve high measurement precision through specialized processing while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional single-modal numerical data processing to multi-dimensional multi-modal data analysis by incorporating image data, text data, numerical data, and contextual information. This dimensional expansion enables comprehensive asset valuation that captures nuances invisible to traditional systems, significantly improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If multi-modal data integration is implemented, then measurement precision and reliability improve, but device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevaluation reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides complex multi-modal data processing into separate specialized modules: computer vision processing for images, NLP processing for text, numerical data processing, and contextual analysis. Each module is optimized for its specific data type, improving reliability through specialized processing while reducing overall system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary processing layers that translate and normalize different data modalities into a unified representation framework. These intermediaries bridge the gap between diverse data types (images, text, numbers) and the valuation engine, ensuring reliable integration without requiring direct complex interactions between all data modalities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If personalized asset evaluations are provided, then adaptability and user relevance improve, but processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and storing asset data in structured formats, pre-computing feature representations from images and text, and maintaining updated user profiles with preference information. This preliminary preparation enables rapid personalized evaluation when users query assets, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts evaluation parameters and weighting factors based on individual user profiles and preferences. By changing parameters such as the importance weight of different asset features, the time horizon for valuation, and risk tolerance factors, the system provides personalized evaluations efficiently without requiring complete re-processing of asset data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If real-time processing is implemented, then productivity and responsiveness improve, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time processing capabilityVSAvoidcomputational infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computational workload is segmented across distributed processing nodes and specialized hardware accelerators. Different data modalities are processed in parallel by separate computational units, enabling real-time processing of multi-modal data without requiring a single complex monolithic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses efficient data representation techniques and cached intermediate results to avoid redundant processing. By copying and storing pre-computed features and representations, the system can rapidly respond to user queries in real-time without re-processing the entire multi-modal asset data from scratch each time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12387269B1Intelligent asset evaluation systems using multi-modal data analysis with neural network architectures and personalization
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 RECURSIVE CAPITAL LLC
  • US12387269B1 patent drawing
  • US12387269B1 patent drawing
  • US12387269B1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to an asset evaluation system that collects multi-modal asset data, extracts asset features using a neural network architecture, and generates personalized value scores based on user profiles. The system analyzes image and textual content to extract asset features, correlates those features with personalization data in user profiles, and generates tailored asset analysis results. The system can predict a value score for each user profile-asset pair in a manner that goes beyond mere consideration of asset pricing, and which accounts for specific personalization parameters stored in each user profile, such as parameters corresponding to the user's technical capabilities and certifications, risk tolerance, investment preferences, timeline requirements, available resources, and potential synergies with existing assets. Additionally, in certain embodiments, the asset evaluation system may employ a distributed architecture that utilizes multiple interconnected processing nodes to efficiently handle large-scale data processing.