Multi-Mode Fulfillment Transaction Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data processing systems lack the ability to arrange schedules for multiple modes of fulfillment for electronic purchases and do not allow customer input for such schedules, limiting the flexibility and efficiency of item processing.

Innovation Solution

A data processing system that identifies multiple modes of fulfillment, such as physical delivery, electronic distribution, and pickup locations, and processes these in a single transaction, allowing customer input for scheduling and payment processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a customer purchases multiple items through traditional retail shopping, then the customer can select and inspect items in person, but the customer is limited by shopping cart capacity and storage space at home

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of items purchasedVSAvoidshopping convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fulfillment process into multiple modes (in-store pickup, shipping, electronic distribution) that can be applied to different items in the same transaction. This allows customers to purchase bulk items while selecting fulfillment methods based on individual item characteristics, resolving the contradiction between purchase quantity and shopping convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides multiple fulfillment modes that can be universally applied across different item types and purchase scenarios. Customers can choose from in-store pickup, shipping, or electronic distribution for any item, making the system adaptable to various needs regardless of item quantity or type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If retail store clerks manually set up shipping for large items, then customers receive shipping services, but store clerks spend excessive time on this task instead of other duties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshipping service availabilityVSAvoidstore clerk efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables customers to self-select shipping options and provide scheduling information during the checkout process. This transfers the responsibility of arranging shipping from store clerks to customers, allowing clerks to focus on higher-value tasks while customers receive the shipping service they need.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Customers provide shipping scheduling information in advance during the purchase transaction. This preliminary action allows the system to automatically arrange shipping without requiring manual intervention by store clerks at the time of fulfillment, improving clerk productivity while maintaining shipping service availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If customers are directed to pickup items at customer service desks, then large items can be collected, but item selection is limited to in-store pickup only

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepickup option availabilityVSAvoiditem selection flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system makes multiple fulfillment modes universally available for all items, including in-store pickup at various locations, shipping to customer addresses, and electronic distribution. Customers can select from these options based on their preferences and item characteristics, greatly increasing item selection flexibility beyond just customer service desk pickup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the system processes multiple fulfillment modes separately, then each item can be handled appropriately, but the transaction process becomes complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefulfillment accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple fulfillment mode selections into a single integrated transaction process. Customers can select different fulfillment modes for different items in one checkout, and the system processes all selections simultaneously, ensuring accurate fulfillment while minimizing transaction processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system captures all fulfillment mode selections and scheduling information during the initial checkout process. This preliminary action allows the system to automatically process and coordinate multiple fulfillment modes without requiring separate transactions or manual intervention later, maintaining both accuracy and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9760941B2Managing the purchase of multiple items with multiple modes of fulfillment
Publication Date: 2017.09.12 DOORDASH INC
  • US9760941B2 patent drawing
  • US9760941B2 patent drawing
  • US9760941B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Processing items is provided. Multiple modes of fulfillment are identified for the items. The items are processed with the multiple modes of fulfillment in a single transaction for a customer.