Multi-Mode Valve with Pressure-Responsive Plunger

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydraulic systems require valves that can efficiently regulate and control fluid flow in multiple modes, including manual and automatic operation, to manage pressure differences effectively, but existing valves lack versatility in achieving this dual functionality.

Innovation Solution

A valve design featuring a cylindrical body with a plunger and activation member that allows fluid communication between two volumes through selective paths, enabling manual operation and automatic opening based on pressure differences, with springs to manage the flow and maintain seals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a valve is designed for manual operation only, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual operationVSAvoidmulti-mode operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The valve is designed with dual functionality to operate in both manual and automatic modes. The activation member can be manually actuated to open the valve, or it can remain passive and allow automatic opening when the pressure differential across the valve exceeds a predetermined threshold. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by enabling the same valve structure to provide both ease of manual operation and adaptability to pressure-based automatic control requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a valve is designed for automatic operation based on pressure difference, then adaptability is improved, but ease of operation is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic pressure-based operationVSAvoidmanual control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The valve incorporates a pressure-responsive mechanism that automatically opens the valve when the pressure differential between inlet and outlet exceeds a predetermined threshold, while simultaneously maintaining manual operability through the activation member. This allows the valve to adapt to pressure-based automatic control needs without sacrificing manual control capability, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If separate valves are used for manual and automatic operation, then reliability is improved, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control reliabilityVSAvoidvalve system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the manual operation mechanism (activation member) and the automatic pressure-responsive mechanism into a single integrated valve body. The activation member can manually move to open the valve, or it can remain stationary and allow pressure differential to automatically open the valve through the same flow path. This consolidation maintains reliability by ensuring consistent flow control across both modes while reducing device complexity by eliminating the need for separate manual and automatic valves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Device complexity

If a single flow path is used, then device complexity is improved, but adaptability is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow path structureVSAvoidoperation mode flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The valve employs a dynamic flow path configuration where a single physical flow path can operate in different modes. The activation member can be positioned to allow manual opening, or it can be positioned to allow automatic pressure-based opening through the same flow path. This dynamic versatility enables the single flow path structure to adapt to different operational requirements (manual vs. automatic mode) without requiring separate flow paths, thus maintaining simplicity while achieving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The valve effectively operates in both manual and automatic modes, ensuring fluid flow control and pressure management, maintaining efficiency and reliability across varying pressure conditions.

Implementation Method 1

fluid flow is only permitted along the second fluid flow path when a pressure difference between the first and second fluid volumes reaches a predetermined value

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS9669533B2Multi-operational valve
Publication Date: 2017.06.06 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP
  • US9669533B2 patent drawing
  • US9669533B2 patent drawing
  • US9669533B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A valve includes a valve body, an inlet orifice in fluid communication with a first fluid volume, an outlet aperture in fluid communication with a second fluid volume and in selective fluid communication with the inlet orifice by a first fluid flow path, an activation member axially movable relative to the valve body, and a plunger axially movable within the valve body. The plunger includes an aperture therethrough defining a second fluid flow path between the first and second fluid volumes. The valve is operable in a first mode in which fluid flow is only permitted along the first fluid flow path in response to manual actuation of the activation member. The valve is operable in a second mode in which fluid flow is only permitted along the second fluid flow path when a pressure difference between the first and second fluid volumes reaches a predetermined value.