Multi-mode Interleaved Wagering System Architecture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current communication and processing systems for complex wagering processes are inadequate, requiring more efficient management and scalability to handle advanced wagering propositions.

Innovation Solution

A multi-mode element interleaved wagering system with a process controller acting as an interface between interactive processing devices and a wager server, allowing for operation in unregulated environments while maintaining regulatory compliance, and enabling efficient scaling and security through encryption and distributed processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a centralized system is used to process wagering data, then communication and processing needs for simple wagering propositions are met, but the system becomes inadequate for complex wagering processes and lacks scalability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidscalability for complex wagering
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the wagering processing architecture into separate functional components: wagering outcome determination servers, game logic servers, and client devices. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in specific tasks, improving overall processing efficiency while enabling independent scaling of complex wagering functions without redesigning the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a multi-layered architectural dimension by implementing both centralized outcome determination and distributed game logic execution. This dimensional expansion allows the system to handle simple wagering propositions through centralized processing while simultaneously supporting complex wagering processes through distributed game logic servers, thereby achieving both processing efficiency and scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If the wager server directly interfaces with interactive processing devices, then direct control is achieved, but regulatory compliance becomes difficult and requires extensive approvals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect controlVSAvoidregulatory compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces process controllers as intermediary components between the wagering outcome determination servers and interactive processing devices. These controllers act as mediators that translate and coordinate communications, allowing the wager server to maintain regulatory compliance by not directly interfacing with unregulated devices while still achieving operational control through the intermediary layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If processing resources are consolidated in one system, then management is simplified, but the system cannot efficiently support multiple types of interactive processing devices with different operating systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem management complexityVSAvoidmulti-device compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The wagering outcome determination servers and process controllers are designed with universal interfaces and protocols that enable them to communicate with multiple types of interactive processing devices running different operating systems. This multi-functionality allows a single server architecture to support diverse client devices without requiring device-specific server instances, thus simplifying management while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of manufacture

If user devices are used for wagering processing, then capital expenditure is reduced, but security and regulatory control are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapital efficiencyVSAvoidsecurity and regulatory control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments security-critical functions from user-controlled functions by placing wagering outcome determination and credit management on secure server infrastructure while allowing game logic and user interface rendering on user devices. This segmentation enables capital efficiency by leveraging existing user devices for non-critical functions while maintaining security and regulatory control through dedicated server components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9990798B2Multi-mode element interleaved wagering system
Publication Date: 2018.06.05 GAMBLIT GAMING LLC
  • US9990798B2 patent drawing
  • US9990798B2 patent drawing
  • US9990798B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-mode element interleaved wagering system is disclosed, including an interactive processing device constructed to: provide an interactive application display; communicate session initiation indication data and application telemetry data; receive wagering telemetry and application resource data; automatically configure a wagering user interface; and incorporate application resource data; a wager server constructed to: receive session wager request data; determine a plurality of wager outcomes; communicate session wager outcome data; receive wager outcome data; and automatically adjust a credit meter; and the process controller operatively connecting the interactive processing device and the wager server, constructed to: receive session initiation indication data; automatically communicate session wager request data; receive session wager outcome data; receive application telemetry data; determine whether to trigger a wager request; access a session wager outcome; automatically determine wagering telemetry data and application resource data; communicate wagering telemetry data, application resource data; and wager outcome data.