Dynamic Multi-Model Content Generation for Accurate User Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to generate accurate content tailored for different entities due to the limitations of individual predictive models, leading to inefficiencies in service offerings and increased risk in network-based transaction processing environments.

Innovation Solution

A multi-model approach is employed that selects between machine learning, heuristic, and exponential smoothing models based on processing volume and tenure length to optimize predictions, ensuring accurate content generation and revenue forecasting for entities, thereby minimizing merchant effort and enhancing service offerings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single predictive model is used for all entities, then the system complexity is low, but the prediction accuracy deteriorates due to the limitations of individual models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the prediction task by dividing entities into different groups based on their characteristics (e.g., transaction volume, tenure length). Each segment is then processed by a specialized predictive model optimized for that segment's specific needs, thereby improving overall prediction accuracy while managing system complexity through structured division.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic model selection mechanism that automatically chooses the most appropriate predictive model based on real-time entity characteristics. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt to varying entity profiles and optimize prediction accuracy without requiring manual intervention or fixed model assignments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If multiple predictive models are used to improve prediction accuracy, then the prediction accuracy improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects among multiple predictive models based on entity characteristics such as transaction volume and tenure length. This dynamic model selection reduces the effective complexity by activating only the necessary models for each specific case, rather than maintaining all models simultaneously active.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the prediction system by adjusting which models are active based on input data characteristics. This parameter-based model selection allows the system to optimize accuracy for different entity types while keeping the overall system manageable through conditional activation rather than permanent complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If generic content is generated for all users, then the processing efficiency is high, but the content relevance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidcontent relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments users into distinct groups based on their predicted characteristics and behaviors. This segmentation enables the system to generate tailored content for each segment while maintaining processing efficiency through automated classification, rather than creating completely custom content for each individual user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by generating content with specific characteristics tailored to each user segment's preferences and behaviors. This allows the content to be highly relevant to local user needs while maintaining overall system efficiency through the use of segmented approaches rather than fully personalized generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If personalized content is generated for each user, then the content relevance improves, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent relevanceVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting users into groups with similar characteristics, the system can generate content for segments rather than individuals, dramatically reducing processing time while maintaining relevance. The segmentation approach preserves personalization benefits at a scalable level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial personalization by tailoring content to user segments rather than individuals. This partial action approach captures the essential personalization benefits needed for content relevance while avoiding the excessive processing time that would result from fully individualized content generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12586093B2Systems and methods for facilitating network content generation via a dynamic multi-model approach
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 STRIPE LLC
  • US12586093B2 patent drawing
  • US12586093B2 patent drawing
  • US12586093B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, a multi-model approach may be utilized to produce predictions with greater accuracy, which may then be used to generate content for one or more entities. In some embodiments, such models may include one or more machine learning models, heuristic models, exponential smoothing models, and/or other models. As an example, based on a processing volume corresponding to user data associated with a user, a first model may be selected for processing the user data over use of a second model for processing the user data. As such, based on the selection of the first machine learning model, the user data may be inputted into the first machine learning model to obtain a predicted result related to the user. Based on the predicted result, content for the user may be generated for display on a user device associated with the user.