Multi-Nozzle Electrochemical Machining for Higher Throughput

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dynamic electrochemical machining processes are time-consuming and challenging to perform consistently, especially when dealing with multiple specimens, as existing systems are limited to single-nozzle, point-to-point applications, requiring extensive reconfiguration and increasing the risk of damage.

Innovation Solution

The system employs multiple nozzles and reservoirs with control circuitry to automate the electrochemical machining process, allowing for simultaneous processing of multiple samples with adjustable parameters like volumetric rate, pressure, and speed, and automatic selection of programs based on sample identification, reducing cycle time and configuration requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple nozzles are used for simultaneous processing, then productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing throughputVSAvoidsystem configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the processing function into multiple independent nozzles (first nozzle, second nozzle, etc.), each capable of processing different specimens simultaneously. This segmentation allows parallel processing operations, directly increasing productivity while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple nozzles are designed with identical or similar structures and functions, each capable of performing the same electrochemical machining operation on different specimens. This multi-functionality allows the system to process multiple specimens simultaneously using the same processing methodology, improving throughput without requiring fundamentally different processing approaches for each specimen

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If automated control circuitry is implemented, then ease of operation improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuitry automatically identifies specimens, selects appropriate processing programs, and executes machining operations without requiring manual intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously managing the entire processing workflow, from specimen identification through completion of machining operations, thereby improving ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control circuitry receives input signals from specimen identification (such as RFID tags or barcodes) and uses this feedback to automatically select and execute the appropriate processing program. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt its operation based on the specific specimen being processed, enhancing ease of operation while managing complexity through intelligent control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If point-to-point single nozzle processing is used, then device complexity is low, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem configurationVSAvoidprocessing cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple nozzles operate simultaneously and continuously on different specimens, eliminating the idle time that occurs when a single nozzle must reposition or reconfigure between specimens. The system maintains continuous useful action across all nozzles, with each nozzle constantly engaged in processing its assigned specimen, thereby dramatically reducing total processing cycle time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces processing time by up to 66% for multiple nozzles, enabling faster completion of electrochemical machining tasks with increased throughput and reduced risk of sample damage, while maintaining consistent results across various specimens.

Implementation Method 1

The electrochemical machining is performed by application of a charge to the nozzle and apply a charge to the sample such that the nozzle and the sample define first and second electrodes of an electrolytic cell, electrically connected by the jet of electrolyte solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIonic conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

a nozzle configured to dispense a jet of an electrolyte solution towards the surface of the sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow: Fluid Spray

Data Source

PatentUS20240286213A1Systems and methods for electrochemical machining
Publication Date: 2024.08.29 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US20240286213A1 patent drawing
  • US20240286213A1 patent drawing
  • US20240286213A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Example electrochemical machining systems and methods for machining a surface of a sample. In particular, the system includes a nozzle configured to dispense a jet of an electrolyte solution towards the surface of the sample. A position or orientation of the nozzle can be controlled to direct the jet of the electrolyte solution from the nozzle towards an area of the surface of the sample (e.g., an area for electrochemical etching or other surface treatment). The electrochemical machining is performed by application of a charge to the nozzle and apply a charge to the sample (e.g., grounding or other charge return path), such that the nozzle and the sample define first and second electrodes of an electrolytic cell, electrically connected by the jet of electrolyte solution.