Multi-Object State Correction Using Shared Relative Position Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods struggle to achieve precise and consistent determination of the state of multiple objects in an association, particularly in dynamic environments where absolute and relative state values are necessary for accurate navigation and control.

Innovation Solution

A method involving each object in the association recording its own absolute and relative states, exchanging these values, and calculating a correction value to ensure consistent and precise absolute state estimation by applying the correction value to its own state, either locally or centrally through a central unit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If absolute navigation methods are used to determine state values of objects in an association, then the absolute position can be obtained, but the precision and consistency of relative state determination deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabsolute position precisionVSAvoidrelative state consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using recorded relative state values to calculate correction values that are applied to absolute state values. Each object in the association records its own absolute state and relative state to other objects, then uses this feedback information to correct its absolute state determination, thereby improving the consistency and precision of relative state determination while maintaining absolute position accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If correction values are calculated and applied to all objects in the association, then the absolute state determination precision is improved, but the data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabsolute state determination precisionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the correction calculation process into individual object-level operations. Each object independently calculates its own correction value based on its recorded absolute and relative state values, rather than requiring centralized processing for all objects. This segmentation reduces overall data processing complexity while maintaining improved precision across the entire association.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of information

If all objects exchange their recorded states via data connections, then the uniform information status is achieved, but the communication overhead and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation uniformityVSAvoiddata exchange time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the information exchange process by having all objects in the association share their recorded absolute and relative state values through data connections. This consolidation of information allows each object to achieve a uniform information status, enabling accurate correction value calculation while optimizing the balance between information uniformity and communication efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12535825B2Determining the state of objects in an association of objects
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 AIRBUS DEFENCE & SPACE GMBH
  • US12535825B2 patent drawing
  • US12535825B2 patent drawing
  • US12535825B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a correction value of a state of an object in an association with a plurality of objects. The method includes: each object in the association recording its own absolute state in an existing coordinate system; a first object in the association recording a relative state of the first object in relation to one or more other objects in the association; the first object transmitting the recorded relative state and its own recorded absolute state via a data connection to one or more of the other objects in the association; exchanging recorded relative states and recorded absolute states in the association of objects so that all objects have the same uniform information status; each object calculating a correction value for all objects in the association based on the uniform information status; an object applying its own correction value to its own recorded absolute state.