Multi-Operator Resource Exchange via Cooperation Index

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for multi-operator collaboration in communication services are inefficient due to the need for monetary exchanges and do not effectively handle circular collaboration scenarios where resources are exchanged among multiple operators without direct reciprocity.

Innovation Solution

A method that calculates a cooperation index based on previous resource exchanges and determines a cooperation flow to optimize resource provision among multiple operators, minimizing pecuniary exchanges and promoting mutual benefit without requiring direct reciprocity between all operators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If monetary exchanges are used to compensate for resource asymmetry between operators, then resource exchange can be facilitated, but operators must go through intermediaries in the value chain which increases complexity and reduces efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource exchange capabilityVSAvoidintermediary involvement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the intermediary function from the resource exchange process by implementing direct peer-to-peer resource sharing between operators. The collaboration graph and automated negotiation mechanism eliminate the need for intermediaries to match operators with complementary resources, allowing operators to directly exchange resources based on their own collaboration graphs and needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new type of intermediary - an automated negotiation system based on collaboration graphs and algorithms - that facilitates resource exchange without requiring traditional monetary intermediaries. This automated mediator enables direct resource sharing by computing optimal exchanges based on pre-established collaboration relationships, reducing both complexity and the need for financial intermediation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional bilateral tit-for-tat collaboration is used between operators, then direct reciprocity is ensured, but circular collaboration scenarios where resources flow through multiple operators cannot be handled effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect reciprocity guaranteeVSAvoidcircular collaboration support
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from bilateral (2-operator) collaboration to multilateral (N-operator) collaboration by introducing collaboration graphs that represent relationships among multiple operators simultaneously. This dimensional expansion allows the system to handle circular collaboration scenarios where resources flow through multiple operators in a cycle, enabling A→B→C→A resource exchanges that were impossible in strict bilateral frameworks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The collaboration graph framework provides a universal mechanism that handles both bilateral and multilateral collaboration scenarios within a single system. The same graph-based representation and negotiation algorithm work for direct operator pairs as well as for complex circular collaborations involving multiple operators, making the system universally applicable to different collaboration topologies without requiring separate mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If operators collaborate to share resources, then resource utilization is improved, but tracking and managing resource exchanges among multiple operators increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidexchange tracking system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing collaboration graphs that encode relationships, trust levels, and resource capabilities between operators before actual resource exchanges occur. These pre-computed collaboration graphs enable rapid negotiation and automatic matching during runtime, eliminating the need for complex real-time tracking and negotiation protocols, thus simplifying the exchange management system while maintaining high resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If resource exchanges are optimized for direct bilateral pairs, then negotiation simplicity is maintained, but overall system-wide resource optimization is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenegotiation simplicityVSAvoidsystem-wide resource optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the overall resource optimization problem into two levels: local collaboration graphs between individual operator pairs (maintaining negotiation simplicity) and global collaboration graphs that capture system-wide relationships (enabling overall optimization). The segmentation allows each operator to negotiate using simple local rules while the aggregated effect achieves system-wide resource optimization through the interplay of multiple local optimizations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240163683A1Method, device and system for making available a communication resource
Publication Date: 2024.05.16 ORANGE SA
  • US20240163683A1 patent drawing
  • US20240163683A1 patent drawing
  • US20240163683A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method allowing collaboration between a plurality of (at least 3) operators that limits the need for monetary exchanges is proposed. The method includes provisioning a first communication resource by a management entity of a first operator to a management entity of a second operator in an infrastructure (Infra) including at least a third operator. The method is implemented by the management entity of the first operator and includes receiving a cooperation index relating to a previous instance of provision of a resource, the determination of a cooperation flow depending on the received cooperation index and on a datum relating to a provided resource and provision of the first resource to the management entity of the second operator depending on the determined cooperation flow.