Multi-Operator Robot Control System with Automatic Vehicle Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robot control systems face challenges in efficiently managing and controlling a large fleet of robotic vehicles, particularly in agricultural applications, where a single operator may struggle to coordinate multiple robots, and existing systems can lead to confusion regarding operator assignments.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising an autonomy module, interface communication module, graphical user interface, short-range network, and long-range network that allows operators to bind and unbind robotic vehicles, enabling autonomous mission execution and efficient fleet management by determining vehicle states and assigning tasks based on availability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single operator controls multiple robots, then the number of robots per operator increases, but the difficulty of controlling and tracking robot assignments increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of robots per operatorVSAvoiddifficulty of controlling and tracking
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines and displays robot availability states and operator assignments without requiring manual tracking by operators. The control system self-updates the interface to reflect current robot states, eliminating the need for operators to mentally track multiple robots and their assignments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The graphical user interface provides real-time feedback to operators about which robots are available, which are assigned, and to whom they are assigned. This continuous feedback loop allows operators to easily monitor and manage robot assignments without cognitive burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If multiple operators control a fleet of robots, then the total control capacity increases, but confusion regarding operator assignments increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal control capacityVSAvoidconfusion regarding operator assignments
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The control system acts as an intermediary that manages and displays operator-robot assignments. The system maintains and communicates the state of which operator controls which robot, preventing confusion by providing a single source of truth for all assignments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The graphical user interface serves multiple functions: it displays robot availability, shows operator assignments, allows operators to select and control robots, and updates automatically when states change. This multi-functional interface consolidates all assignment information in one place, eliminating confusion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If operators manually track available robots, then control accuracy increases, but the mental burden on operators increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidmental burden on operators
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines robot availability states and updates the interface without requiring operator intervention for tracking. The control system performs the tracking function itself, providing accurate information while eliminating the mental burden from operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual cognitive process of tracking robot states is replaced by an automated electronic system. The control system uses sensors, communication networks, and software to automatically determine and display robot availability, replacing the operator's mental tracking mechanism with an automated electronic tracking system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9310802B1Multi-operator, multi-robot control system with automatic vehicle selection
Publication Date: 2016.04.12 RAVEN INDUSTRIES INC
  • US9310802B1 patent drawing
  • US9310802B1 patent drawing
  • US9310802B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling a plurality of robotic vehicles may involve the steps of: Determining a state of each of the plurality of robotic vehicles; assigning a robotic vehicle to an operator in response to a Binding command from the operator; allowing the operator to command the assigned robotic vehicle to perform a mission; and releasing the assigned robotic vehicle in response to an Unbinding command from the operator.