Multi-Oriented Hydraulic Fracturing Model for Stress-Aligned Fractures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mathematical models for fracturing subterranean formations are limited by assuming elastic properties and neglecting stress alterations and tectonic motions, leading to fractures being induced in near-identical orientations, which may not enhance hydrocarbon flow or reservoir production effectively.

Innovation Solution

The multi-oriented hydraulic fracturing (MOHF) model incorporates pseudo-plastic properties and tiny tectonic motions to calculate local stress directions, allowing for fractures to be created in multiple orientations, thereby enhancing fracturing operations by simulating stress changes and dynamic interactions between rock layers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional mathematical models based on elastic characteristics are used to design additional fractures, then the number of locations for drainage into the wellbore increases, but the fractures are induced with near-identical angular orientation and do not introduce new directions for hydrocarbon flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of fracture locationsVSAvoidfracture orientation diversity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the mathematical model from elastic characteristics to pseudo-plastic characteristics, incorporating stress alterations and tectonic motions. This parameter change enables the model to predict and create fractures with diverse orientations rather than near-identical orientations, thereby introducing new directions for hydrocarbon flow while maintaining multiple fracture locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If conventional models neglect stress alterations around existing fractures, then the modeling process is simpler, but the models fail to utilize stress alterations when inducing new fractures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling process complexityVSAvoidfracture induction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary calculation of stress alterations around existing fractures before inducing new fractures. By pre-computing the stress field modifications caused by previous fractures and incorporating them into the modeling process, the system achieves accurate fracture induction while maintaining a systematic and manageable workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the stress alterations from existing fractures are continuously monitored and fed back into the model to influence the orientation and placement of new fractures. This feedback loop ensures that each new fracture is induced considering the cumulative stress state, improving reliability without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If fractures are induced with near-identical angular orientation, then the modeling and implementation is straightforward, but new directions for hydrocarbon flow are not introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracturing operation simplicityVSAvoidhydrocarbon flow enhancement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamics into the fracturing operation by making fracture orientation a variable that adapts to local stress conditions rather than being fixed. The model dynamically calculates optimal fracture orientations based on pseudo-plastic properties, stress alterations, and tectonic motions, enabling diverse fracture directions that enhance hydrocarbon flow while maintaining operational feasibility through systematic modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach increases the effectiveness of fracturing operations by creating fractures that penetrate deeper into the formation, enhancing hydrocarbon flow and reservoir production, and improving the stimulated reservoir volume and connected stimulated reservoir volume.

Implementation Method 1

mathematical modeling is used to design the second fractures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFracture Mechanics: Fracture Mechanics

Implementation Method 2

hydraulic fracturing operations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic Pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 3

calculate local stress directions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStress Analysis:

Implementation Method 4

conventional mathematical modeling is only based on the elastic characteristics of the formation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10711577B2Multi-oriented hydraulic fracturing models and methods
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US10711577B2 patent drawing
  • US10711577B2 patent drawing
  • US10711577B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-oriented hydraulic fracturing (MOHF) model may incorporate the pseudo-plastic properties of the formation and tiny tectonic motions from fracturing to enhance MOHF operations. For example, a method may include modeling a simulated wellbore penetrating a simulated subterranean formation with a MOHF model having (1) static inputs and (2) dynamic inputs that comprise pseudo-plastic properties of rocks that comprise the subterranean formation; simulating a first fracture in the subterranean formation with first fracture operational parameters with the MOHF model; calculating formation stresses with the MOHF model after the first fracture; simulating a second fracture in the subterranean formation with of second fracture operational parameters with the MOHF model; and calculating a simulated fracture network characteristic for each of the plurality of first and second fracture operational parameters with the MOHF model, thereby producing several simulated fracture network characteristics that may be used for selecting the preferred operational parameters.