Multi-Party Dynamic Bartering Network System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional barter models face challenges such as the requirement for a double or multiple coincidence of wants between parties, making it difficult to implement effectively in practice, especially in multi-party transactions.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based multi-party dynamic bartering network system that generates and facilitates multi-party barter loop options by analyzing user profiles for supply and demand information, proposing loop options to users, and enabling the completion of barter transactions through virtual connections and additional party participation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional two-party barter model is used, then simplicity of operation is maintained, but the requirement for double coincidence of wants limits the number of possible transactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of possible barter transactionsVSAvoidcomplexity of barter matching system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a computer-based barter exchange system as an intermediary that automatically matches multiple parties' supply and demand information. This intermediary computes complex multi-party barter loops without requiring direct coordination between all parties, thus increasing transaction versatility while managing system complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of party participation from traditional two-party to multi-party configurations. By allowing three or more parties to form barter loops, the system expands the number of possible transactions while using computer algorithms to manage the increased complexity of matching multiple supply and demand parameters simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If three-party barter model is employed to increase transaction flexibility, then more parties can participate, but the requirement for multiple coincidence of wants makes implementation difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility of barter arrangementsVSAvoidease of implementing barter transactions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The barter exchange system performs self-service by automatically analyzing supply and demand information, computing matching barter loops, and presenting options to users. This eliminates the need for manual coordination between multiple parties, making multi-party barter arrangements easy to implement while maintaining high flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical coordination process between multiple parties with an electronic computer-based system. The computer automatically processes supply and demand data, computes barter loops, and manages transactions, substituting complex human-to-human negotiation with automated electronic matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If manual barter coordination is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but time required to find matching parties increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of matching barter partiesVSAvoidcomplexity of matching system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual barter coordination with automated computer processing. The computer rapidly analyzes supply and demand information from multiple users, computes potential barter loops, and presents matches instantly, dramatically increasing productivity while the electronic system manages the complexity that would be prohibitive in manual coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10332166B2System and method for a multi-party dynamic bartering network
Publication Date: 2019.06.25 HAVE NEED
  • US10332166B2 patent drawing
  • US10332166B2 patent drawing
  • US10332166B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is disclosed of generating a computer-based, multi-party dynamic bartering network. The method includes: receiving, at a computer server, user supply information and user demand information from multiple parties over a computer network; generating multi-party barter loop options, using one or more processors, in response to a search request by a searching user, by analyzing the user supply information and user demand information; proposing multi-party barter loop options to the searching user over the computer network; receiving confirmation of the searching user joining a multi-party barter loop from the proposed multi-party barter loop options; and facilitating execution of the multi-party barter loop.