Multi-path Defibrillation via Impedance-Adaptive Waveforms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current transthoracic defibrillation technologies, including biphasic waveforms and multiple-electrode systems, have a shock success rate of less than 70% for ventricular fibrillation, with remaining excitable gaps that can lead to refibrillation, due to inadequate current distribution and stimulation of myocardial tissue.

Innovation Solution

A transthoracic defibrillator system using three or more electrodes to establish multiple electrical paths across the thoracic cavity, with adjustable waveform parameters based on impedance distribution, delivering different defibrillation waveforms across each path to achieve a more uniform current density distribution and reduce excitable gaps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional single-path defibrillation is used, then the device complexity is low, but the defibrillation efficacy is insufficient with success rate less than 70%

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefibrillation success rateVSAvoidelectrode system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The defibrillation system is segmented into multiple independent electrical paths, each with its own electrode pair. The defibrillator delivers defibrillation pulses through at least two different electrode pairs simultaneously or sequentially, creating multiple current vectors that traverse different portions of the heart. This segmentation allows broader and more uniform current distribution across the myocardium, improving defibrillation efficacy while managing system complexity through modular electrode design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple electrode systems are used to improve current distribution, then the current density uniformity improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent density distribution uniformityVSAvoidelectrode system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different electrode pairs are positioned to target specific regions of the heart, with each electrode pair creating a current vector optimized for its local anatomical region. The system adjusts waveform parameters independently for each electrical path based on local impedance characteristics, ensuring optimal current density distribution in each region. This local quality approach achieves uniform overall current distribution without requiring excessive electrodes throughout the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The defibrillator dynamically adjusts waveform parameters (amplitude, duration, shape) for each electrical path based on real-time impedance measurements and anatomical variations. The system can selectively activate different electrode pairs or combinations based on the detected arrhythmia type and patient anatomy, optimizing current distribution adaptively rather than using a fixed complex electrode configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If high energy shocks are delivered to ensure depolarization, then the defibrillation capability improves, but the harmful effects such as tissue damage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefibrillation capabilityVSAvoidtissue damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The total defibrillation energy is segmented and distributed across multiple electrical paths rather than concentrated in a single high-energy shock. Each electrode pair delivers a lower energy pulse, but the combined effect of multiple paths achieves sufficient total current through the heart to depolarize myocardial tissue effectively. This segmentation reduces peak energy density at any single location, minimizing thermal and mechanical tissue damage while maintaining defibrillation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system improves defibrillation efficacy by reducing the areal extent of excitable gaps and enhancing current delivery to the heart, potentially increasing the success rate of defibrillation and reducing the risk of refibrillation.

Implementation Method 1

the defibrillator circuit has the capability to deliver a different defibrillation waveform across each of the at least two electrical paths

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS9174061B2Multi-path transthoracic defibrillation and cardioversion
Publication Date: 2015.11.03 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION
  • US9174061B2 patent drawing
  • US9174061B2 patent drawing
  • US9174061B2 patent drawing

AI summary

External electromagnetic stimulation of the interior of the body by applying three or more electrodes to the exterior of the patient to establish at least two electrical paths across the interior of the patient, determining impedance information representative of an impedance distribution across the interior of the body, delivering an electromagnetic waveform across each of the at least two electrical paths, wherein at least one parameter of the waveform is selected using the impedance information to produce a selected current density distribution at one or more locations within the interior of the body.