Multi-phase Converter Controller Using Dynamic Hysteresis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-phase converters face challenges in maintaining a constant switching frequency and enabling interleaving operation without requiring a master-slave configuration or imposing constraints on the number of phases based on the conversion ratio, while also avoiding subharmonic oscillations and maintaining robust dynamic performance.

Innovation Solution

A sliding mode controller for multi-phase DC-DC converters uses a dynamic hysteresis value to achieve constant switching frequency and interleaving by dynamically modulating the hysteresis band, eliminating the need for master-slave operation and constraints on the number of phases, and improving dynamic behavior compared to other control methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a multi-phase converter controller uses a fixed hysteresis value, then the control is simple, but the switching frequency cannot be kept constant and interleaving operation cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidswitching frequency stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from a fixed hysteresis value to a dynamic hysteresis value that changes based on operating conditions. The controller dynamically adjusts the hysteresis value to maintain constant switching frequency and enable interleaving operation, resolving the contradiction between control simplicity and frequency stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the hysteresis parameter from a fixed value to a dynamically adjustable value. By modifying the hysteresis parameter based on switching period and phase shift measurements, the system achieves constant switching frequency and proper interleaving while maintaining relatively simple control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a master-slave configuration is used to control multi-phase converter, then the switching frequency can be controlled, but the system complexity increases and constraints on the number of phases are imposed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching frequency controlVSAvoidcontrol configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by creating a control method that works for any number of phases without requiring specific master-slave configurations. The dynamic hysteresis approach provides a universal solution that adapts to different phase counts and converter topologies, eliminating the need for complex phase-specific control arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the master-slave configuration requirement from the control system by using a unified dynamic hysteresis approach. This removes the need for designating specific phases as master or slave, simplifying the control architecture while maintaining frequency control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If conventional control methods are used, then the converter can operate, but subharmonic oscillations occur and dynamic performance is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconverter operationVSAvoiddynamic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by measuring the switching period and phase shift, then using these measurements to dynamically adjust the hysteresis value. This closed-loop feedback mechanism prevents subharmonic oscillations and improves dynamic performance while maintaining stable converter operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for efficient control of multi-phase converters with no master phase requirement, no constraints on the number of phases, better dynamic behavior, and prevention of subharmonic oscillations, thus enhancing the performance and robustness of the converter.

Implementation Method 1

compare the sliding value to a reference value using a hysteretic comparator function with the dynamic hysteresis value

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHysteresis: Hysteresis

Data Source

PatentUS10090765B1Multi-phase converter controller using dynamic hysteresis value
Publication Date: 2018.10.02 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US10090765B1 patent drawing
  • US10090765B1 patent drawing
  • US10090765B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one example, a circuit for controlling a multi-phase converter is configured to determine an operating condition at a multi-phase converter module. Each phase switching module of a plurality of phase switching modules is configured to electrically couple, based on a respective switching signal, a voltage source to a respective phase of the multi-phase converter module. The circuit is further configured to, for each switching signal, generate an operating value using the operating condition and determine a dynamic hysteresis value for a next switching period using a duration of a previous switching period and a phase shift. The circuit is further configured to, for each switching signal, compare the operating value to a reference value with a hysteretic comparator function using the dynamic hysteresis value and generate the respective switching signal based on the comparison of the operating value to the reference value.