Multi-phase Lesion Detection via Unified Feature Maps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting and characterizing lesions in multi-phase imaging are subjective, prone to errors, and do not effectively utilize dynamic enhancement patterns, leading to variability and uncertainty in clinical evaluations.

Innovation Solution

A deep learning method that involves acquiring multi-phase images, extracting local contexts, encoding these into phase-specific feature maps, and combining them to create a unified feature map for enhanced lesion detection and characterization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual evaluation by radiologists is used, then clinical experience can be applied, but subjectivity and variability increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation consistencyVSAvoidmanual evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual radiologist evaluation with an automated deep learning system that processes multi-phase imaging data. The system uses neural networks to automatically detect and characterize lesions, eliminating human subjectivity and variability while maintaining clinical expertise through trained algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The deep learning system performs self-evaluation by automatically analyzing multi-phase images, extracting features, and generating lesion characterizations without requiring manual radiologist intervention for each case, thereby improving consistency and reducing variability in clinical evaluations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If deep learning methods work on single phase images or in a phase-agnostic manner, then processing is simpler, but dynamic enhancement patterns are ignored

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelesion characterization accuracyVSAvoidmulti-phase feature fusion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the multi-phase imaging data into phase-specific feature maps, where each phase is processed independently to capture its unique characteristics. This segmentation allows the system to preserve dynamic enhancement patterns while managing complexity through modular phase-specific processing followed by fusion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines phase-specific feature maps into a unified representation that integrates information from all phases. This merging process enables the system to leverage dynamic enhancement patterns across phases while maintaining the benefits of phase-specific analysis, thereby improving lesion characterization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If 3D models are used to take advantage of volumetric context, then structural information is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolumetric context utilizationVSAvoidmodel parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments volumetric data into phase-specific 2D feature maps rather than processing the entire 3D volume at once. This segmentation reduces computational complexity by breaking down the large-scale 3D problem into manageable phase-specific components while preserving essential volumetric context through the multi-phase approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts phase-specific features from volumetric data, isolating the most relevant information from each phase. This extraction process reduces the computational burden by focusing on key features rather than processing all volumetric data, thereby managing model complexity while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If detection and characterization are performed on individual phases separately, then processing is more manageable, but performance degrades when phase acquisition is not standardized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing manageabilityVSAvoidperformance under variable protocols
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges phase-specific feature maps into a unified representation that integrates information across all phases. This fusion approach makes the system robust to variations in phase acquisition protocols because the combined representation leverages complementary information from multiple phases, improving reliability under non-standardized conditions while maintaining processing manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12299882B2Method for detection and characterization of lesions
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US12299882B2 patent drawing
  • US12299882B2 patent drawing
  • US12299882B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for detection and characterization of lesions includes acquiring a plurality of phase images of a multi-phase imaging exam, extracting a local context for each phase image of the plurality of phase images, encoding the local contexts to create phase specific feature maps, combining the phase-specific feature maps to create unified feature maps, and at least one of characterizing or detecting a lesion based on the unified feature maps.