Multi-phenomenology Object Detection via Centroid Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current techniques face limitations in resolving closely spaced objects due to diffraction limitations, signal to noise ratio, and pixel sample size, especially when one object is larger or brighter than others, making it difficult to accurately detect and characterize multiple objects in space situational awareness and astronomy applications.

Innovation Solution

The method involves imaging a target area with an array to detect different image characteristics of electromagnetic radiation, computing centroids for these characteristics, and comparing their locations to resolve the number of objects, utilizing various phenomenologies such as polarimetry and spectroscopy to enhance detection capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional imaging techniques are used to detect closely spaced objects, then the detection process is simple, but the resolution is limited by diffraction and cannot distinguish closely spaced objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveangular resolutionVSAvoidimaging technique complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the imaging process into multiple independent measurements of different image characteristics (intensity, polarization, spectrum, time-lapse) rather than relying on a single measurement. Each characteristic provides independent information about the objects, allowing the system to resolve closely spaced objects by comparing multiple segmented measurements rather than attempting to resolve them in a single complex image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional spatial imaging to multi-dimensional measurement by incorporating additional image characteristics (polarization state, spectral content, temporal variations). This dimensional expansion allows resolution of objects that are indistinguishable in the traditional two-dimensional image plane, as the additional dimensions provide independent information about object locations and characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If hypothesis testing techniques like Pixon method are used to resolve images beyond Rayleigh limit, then resolution improves, but computational complexity increases significantly requiring extensive computation capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage resolutionVSAvoidcomputational power requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and measures multiple independent image characteristics (intensity, polarization, spectrum, time-lapse variations) separately rather than attempting to solve the full inverse problem in one complex computation. By taking out and measuring each characteristic independently, the system avoids the computationally intensive hypothesis testing required by methods like Pixon, while still achieving super-resolution through comparison of these extracted characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent allows the natural variations in different image characteristics to provide the resolving information automatically. By measuring how different characteristics (polarization, spectrum, time-lapse) naturally vary across the field of view, the system self-determines object locations and characteristics without requiring extensive computational hypothesis testing to reconstruct the image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If single image characteristic detection is used, then the detection process is simple and fast, but the ability to resolve closely spaced objects is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject separation resolutionVSAvoidmulti-characteristic detection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the imaging array multi-functional by enabling it to detect multiple image characteristics (intensity, polarization, spectrum, time-lapse) using the same physical array. This universality allows the system to resolve closely spaced objects by comparing measurements from the same array across different characteristics, avoiding the need for multiple separate imaging systems while still achieving enhanced resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8175393B2Multi-phenomenology object detection
Publication Date: 2012.05.08 RAYTHEON CO
  • US8175393B2 patent drawing
  • US8175393B2 patent drawing
  • US8175393B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and system for utilizing multiple phenomenological techniques to resolve closely spaced objects during imaging includes detecting a plurality of closely spaced objects through the imaging of a target area by an array, and spreading electromagnetic radiation received from the target area across several pixels. During the imaging, different phenomenological techniques may be applied to capture discriminating features that may affect a centroid of the electromagnetic radiation received on the array. Comparing the locations of the centroids over multiple images may be used to resolve a number of objects imaged by the array. Examples of such phenomenological discriminating techniques may include imaging the target area in multiple polarities of light or in multiple spectral bands of light. Another embodiment includes time-lapse imaging of the target area, to compare time lapse centroids for multiple movement signal characteristics over pluralities of pixels on the array.