Multi-Plane Brush Cutter Head for Low-Vibration Mulching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cutting tools for brush cutters, such as filaments, blades, and metal discs, suffer from issues like abrasion, breakage, high energy consumption, noise, safety hazards, and complex designs, limiting their effectiveness and safety for professional use, especially in mulching applications.

Innovation Solution

A cutting head design featuring planar, freely rotatable cutting discs arranged in multiple planes, which absorb impacts and distribute cutting forces to minimize energy consumption and vibration, while providing a mulching function by cutting vegetation into small pieces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If cutting filaments are used, then the cutting head can cut grass and edging, but the filaments are prone to abrasion or breakage requiring frequent changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of filament replacementVSAvoidfilament durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting head is divided into multiple independent cutting elements (multiple filaments arranged in a star pattern) that can operate independently. This segmentation allows the system to maintain cutting functionality even when individual filaments wear or break, and simplifies replacement as individual filaments can be replaced without replacing the entire cutting head assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameters of the cutting filaments by using high-strength, abrasion-resistant materials with optimized diameter and tensile strength properties. The filaments are designed with specific mechanical properties (tensile strength, elasticity modulus) that balance durability, flexibility, and cutting efficiency, resolving the contradiction between ease of replacement and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If large diameter filaments are used, then cutting capability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a single large-diameter filament, the patent segments the cutting function into multiple smaller-diameter filaments arranged in a star pattern. This distribution of cutting function across multiple elements reduces the diameter requirement for each individual filament while maintaining overall cutting capability, thereby reducing energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-point cutting approach to a multi-point cutting approach by arranging filaments in a star pattern across different radial positions. This dimensional arrangement allows smaller filaments to collectively achieve the cutting power of a single large filament, reducing energy consumption while maintaining cutting strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If flexible filaments are used, then the filament can adapt to cutting surfaces, but the filament tends to slam during rotation generating noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilament flexibilityVSAvoidnoise from slamming
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting head uses multiple thin filaments instead of a single thick filament. This segmentation reduces the mass of each individual filament, thereby reducing the impact force and noise generated during rotation while maintaining flexibility for adapting to cutting surfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the physical parameters of the filaments, including diameter, material density, and tensile strength, to achieve an optimal balance between flexibility and noise reduction. The filaments are designed with specific dimensional parameters that minimize slamming noise while maintaining the flexibility needed for effective cutting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If plastic cutting blades are used, then dense or hard vegetation can be cut, but the blade can break into pieces following impact on hard obstacles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting power for dense vegetationVSAvoidblade integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a single solid plastic blade, the patent segments the cutting function into multiple thin filaments. This segmentation ensures that if one filament breaks, the others continue to function, and the broken pieces are smaller and less likely to cause injury. The star pattern arrangement distributes the cutting force across multiple elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses thin, flexible filament structures instead of rigid solid blades. These thin filaments can bend and deform upon impact with hard obstacles, absorbing impact energy and reducing the likelihood of breaking into dangerous pieces while maintaining cutting effectiveness for dense vegetation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

5Strength

If metal discs are used, then cutting of dense or dry vegetation is effective, but sparks are generated resulting from contact with stone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting effectivenessVSAvoidsparks causing fire risk
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from metal to non-metallic, non-sparking materials such as high-strength plastic or composite materials. This material substitution eliminates spark generation and fire risk while maintaining cutting effectiveness through optimized filament design, multiple cutting points, and appropriate material hardness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials that combine the advantages of different materials - the strength and durability needed for cutting dense vegetation with the non-sparking, safe properties of non-metallic materials. These composite filaments achieve both cutting effectiveness and safety by integrating multiple material properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

6Productivity

If multiple cutting elements are added to provide mulching function, then vegetation can be cut into small pieces, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulching functionVSAvoidcutting head design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses multiple cutting filaments arranged in a star pattern, where each filament acts as an independent cutting element. This segmentation provides the mulching function by creating multiple cutting points that chop vegetation into small pieces, while the modular filament design keeps the overall system relatively simple and easy to manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The same multi-filament star pattern cutting head design serves multiple functions: it provides both the cutting function and the mulching function simultaneously. The multiple filaments create multiple cutting points that chop vegetation into small pieces for mulching, eliminating the need for separate collection operations while maintaining a relatively simple device structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4124228B1Head for brush cutters
Publication Date: 2025.10.22 TECOMEC
  • EP4124228B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4124228B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4124228B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A head 1 for brush cutter suitable for cutting grass and herbaceous plants having a support element 2, rotatable about a vertical axis Y-Y thereof, connected to a series of first pins 3 and a series of second pins 4. The series of first pins 3 is coupled to a first plurality of cutting elements 5 and the series of second pins 4 is coupled to a second plurality of cutting elements 6. Said first plurality of cutting elements 5 defines a cutting plane P1 and said second plurality of cutting elements defines a second cutting plane P2, spaced apart from the previous one. The first and second plurality of cutting elements 5, 6 having, over an angular sector of 360°, an alternating arrangement.