Multi-Plant Holder for Simultaneous Tissue Culture Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current plant tissue culture (PTC) propagation methods are costly due to high labor expenses, inefficient, and prone to contamination, especially during the deflasking stage, where plants are transferred from sterile containers to greenhouse conditions, and existing automation technologies have not significantly reduced these issues.

Innovation Solution

A plant propagation system featuring a holder for multiple plants that allows simultaneous cutting operations, a tray system with aligned openings for efficient growth and cutting, and a nutrient delivery system for controlled nutrient supply, enabling increased propagation rates and reduced labor costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional manual plant propagation methods are used, then labor costs are high and productivity is low, but the process is simple and contamination risks are manageable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropagation rateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the propagation process into distinct functional modules: a holder for securing plants, a cutting mechanism for simultaneous cutting operations, and a nutrient delivery system. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently while working together to increase overall productivity without requiring complete redesign of the entire propagation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple functions into an integrated system where the holder simultaneously secures multiple plants in aligned positions, the cutting mechanism can process multiple plants at once, and the nutrient delivery system serves all plants simultaneously. This merging of functions directly increases propagation rate while managing system complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If plants are processed one at a time, then handling is simple and contamination is minimized, but propagation efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropagation efficiencyVSAvoidcontamination risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The holder is designed to pre-position multiple plants in aligned positions before the cutting operation begins. This preliminary arrangement allows the cutting mechanism to process multiple plants simultaneously in a controlled manner, increasing efficiency while the holder's structure itself helps maintain sterility and prevent contamination during the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The holder acts as an intermediary device between the cutting mechanism and the plants, providing a controlled interface that allows simultaneous processing while maintaining separation and reducing contamination risk. The holder's structure mediates the interaction between multiple plants and the cutting tool, enabling efficient processing without compromising sterility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If automated cutting mechanisms are introduced, then labor costs are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabor costVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to be largely self-contained with the holder automatically securing plants in the correct positions and the cutting mechanism automatically processing them without requiring complex external control systems. This self-service approach reduces labor costs while keeping the automation system relatively simple by using the plants themselves and their holder positions as the control reference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Area of stationary object

If multiple plants are held in close proximity, then space utilization is improved, but contamination risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidcontamination risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The holder provides individual compartments or positions for each plant, creating localized sterile zones that prevent cross-contamination between adjacent plants. This local quality approach allows close spacing for improved space utilization while maintaining individual plant separation that reduces contamination risk through the holder's structured design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240260529A1Plant propagation systems, devices and methods
Publication Date: 2024.08.08 LOWES TC PTY LTD
  • US20240260529A1 patent drawing
  • US20240260529A1 patent drawing
  • US20240260529A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A plant propagation system is provided that includes a holder for holding at least two plants in relative spaced apart relation to enable a predetermined operation (such as, for example, a cutting operation) to be performed on each of the plants within the holder during a single pass.