Multi-Point Pool Safety Pipe Assembly for Entrapment Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Swimming pool suction ports pose a risk of entrapment and cavitation due to single-point vacuum intake, which can cause injuries to swimmers, especially children, and damage pool pumps.

Innovation Solution

A swimming pool safety pipe assembly with multiple vent intakes and a cross pipe fitting that diverts suction to reduce direct entrapment risk and prevents cavitation by providing supplemental water flow, eliminating the need for manual valve adjustments during vacuum hose removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single vacuum intake port is used, then the suction force is strong enough to effectively vacuum the pool, but the risk of entrapment and cavitation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum effectivenessVSAvoidentrapment risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The single vacuum intake port is segmented into multiple separate intake ports distributed around the pool. This divides the concentrated suction force into multiple weaker sources, reducing the entrapment risk at each location while collectively maintaining effective vacuum coverage across the pool surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vacuum intake system transitions from a single-point (0D) or localized (2D) port to a distributed multi-point configuration across the pool surface (3D spatial distribution). This dimensional expansion of the intake architecture disperses the suction hazard while preserving overall vacuum functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If a single vacuum intake port is used, then the system is simple to install and maintain, but pump cavitation occurs when the vacuum hose is removed or blocked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidpump protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system is pre-configured with multiple intake ports and a manifold structure during installation. This preliminary architectural design automatically provides alternative flow paths before any blockage or hose removal occurs, preventing cavitation without requiring real-time monitoring or manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the flow distribution parameters by providing multiple parallel intake pathways. When one port is blocked or disconnected, the flow parameters automatically redistribute through alternative ports, maintaining sufficient water flow to the pump and preventing cavitation conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If manual valve adjustments are required when removing the vacuum hose, then the single intake port can be optimized for vacuuming, but operator intervention is needed to prevent cavitation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum performanceVSAvoidoperational convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The multi-port system with manifold architecture provides self-regulating flow distribution. When the vacuum hose is removed or blocked from one port, the system automatically redirects flow through remaining ports without requiring operator intervention or manual valve adjustments, making the system self-protecting against cavitation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances swimmer safety by minimizing suction entrapment hazards and preventing pump cavitation, ensuring safer and more reliable pool operation with automatic compensation for hose removal, while maintaining regulatory compliance.

Implementation Method 1

The suction ports powerfully draw in water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Implementation Method 2

The exit port is designed to be coupled to a pool pump to draw water from a swimming pool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

The tapered passage is designed to receive and seat a tapered end of a vacuum hose inserted through the vacuum intake and into the cross pipe fitting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical contact: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS12454838B1Swimming pool safety pipe assembly and method therefor
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 LACKERDAS JOHN
  • US12454838B1 patent drawing
  • US12454838B1 patent drawing
  • US12454838B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A swimming pool safety pipe assembly includes a vacuum intake, a vacuum cover, a first vent intake, a second vent intake, and a cross pipe fitting. The vacuum intake, the first vent intake, and the second vent intake are designed to be mounted in a swimming pool wall. The cross pipe fitting includes a vacuum port, a first vent port, a second vent port, an exit port, and a tapered passage. The exit port is designed to be coupled to a pool pump to draw water from a swimming pool simultaneously into the vacuum intake, the first vent intake, and the second vent intake. The tapered passage is positioned in the exit port. The tapered passage is designed to receive and seat a tapered end of a vacuum hose inserted through the vacuum intake and into the cross pipe fitting.