Multi-Point School Locking System for Door Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing door security systems are inadequate in preventing unauthorized entry, particularly in school settings, as they often rely on single-point locking mechanisms that can be vulnerable to force and manipulation, potentially allowing intruders to gain access by bending or breaking the door.

Innovation Solution

A multi-point locking system comprising a schoollock-mount, schoollock-pin, schoollock-arm, and schoollock-door-latch, which utilizes the structural integrity of the door and frame to provide enhanced security by fixingly coupling the door at multiple locations, including the top, middle, and lower sections, using solid steel components and a lift-swing-drop methodology to resist lateral movement and force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single-point locking mechanism is used, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability of door security is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor securityVSAvoidlocking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is divided into multiple independent locking points (top, middle, and bottom of the door) that can be engaged simultaneously. Each locking point operates independently but contributes to the overall security, transforming a single-point lock into a multi-point locking system that distributes security functions across multiple locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple locking mechanisms (locking bars, locking plates, fastening elements) into a unified multi-point locking system that operates through a single control mechanism. This merging approach allows the system to provide enhanced security while maintaining operational simplicity through coordinated action of multiple components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Strength

If solid steel components are used throughout, then the strength and resistance to force increases, but the weight of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to forceVSAvoidsystem weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies solid steel components specifically at critical locations where strength is most needed - such as the locking bars, locking plates, and fastening elements that directly resist forcing attempts. Other parts of the system use materials and designs appropriate to their specific functional requirements, optimizing the overall weight-strength ratio by concentrating high-strength materials only where necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11434674B2Systems, devices, and/or methods for managing building doors
Publication Date: 2022.09.06 GOSS CHRISTIAN JOSEPH
  • US11434674B2 patent drawing
  • US11434674B2 patent drawing
  • US11434674B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain exemplary embodiments can provide a system comprising a schoollock-mount coupleable to a doorframe of a door; a schoollock-pin slidably coupleable to the schoollock-mount; a schoollock-arm slidably coupleable to the schoollock-pin; and a schoollock-door-latch. The schoollock-door-latch is coupleable to the door via the one or more apertures.