Multi-Point Welding Quality Evaluation Using Local Determination Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing welding technologies lack a systematic method for evaluating the quality of welding at multiple points on a workpiece, leading to inconsistent and potentially suboptimal welding results.

Innovation Solution

A welding system and method that includes a welder, robot apparatus, and evaluation apparatus to acquire and evaluate welding data using a determination algorithm associated with each welding point, enabling precise quality assessment through data acquisition and machine learning-based models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single evaluation method is used for all welding points, then the evaluation process is simple, but the welding quality assessment becomes inconsistent across different points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding quality assessment consistencyVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the welding evaluation system into multiple determination algorithms, each specifically designed for individual welding points. This segmentation allows each welding point to be evaluated with a customized algorithm that accounts for its specific characteristics, thereby improving assessment consistency without requiring a single overly complex universal algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by associating different determination algorithms with different welding points based on their specific requirements. Each welding point receives a tailored evaluation approach rather than a uniform method, ensuring that the assessment matches the local characteristics of each welding location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If detailed analysis of welding conditions is performed for each welding point, then evaluation accuracy improves, but the construction and implementation becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding quality evaluation accuracyVSAvoiddetermination algorithm construction difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex evaluation task into multiple simpler determination algorithms, each handling a specific welding point. This division reduces the construction difficulty for each individual algorithm while maintaining high overall evaluation accuracy through the collective contribution of all algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a framework where determination algorithms can be systematically applied across multiple welding points. While each algorithm is customized for its specific welding point, they all follow a unified structure and methodology, making the overall system manageable and reducing implementation difficulty through standardized approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12564906B2Welding system, method for evaluating welding quality, and method for manufacturing welding product
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 YASKAWA DENKI KK
  • US12564906B2 patent drawing
  • US12564906B2 patent drawing
  • US12564906B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A welding system includes a welder configured to weld a workpiece at welding points on the workpiece, data acquisition circuitry configured to acquire welding data indicating welding quality at the welding points, and quality evaluation circuitry configured to evaluate the welding quality at each of the welding points based on the welding data according to a determination algorithm which is associated with each of the welding points.