Multi-Pole Resonator Oscillator for Wide Tuning and Low Phase Noise

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional oscillators have limited tuning range and unacceptable phase noise levels, especially when attempting to cover broader frequency ranges, necessitating additional components to maintain phase noise, which complicates design and reduces practical tuning capabilities.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a tunable oscillator with a multi-pole resonator (MPR) in a feedback loop, utilizing variable reactive elements like varactors and switched capacitors, to achieve wide tuning range and reduced phase noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a voltage-controlled capacitor or varactor is used to increase the oscillator tuning range, then the tuning range is extended, but the phase noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning rangeVSAvoidphase noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The oscillator is divided into multiple independent resonator sections, each contributing to the overall frequency tuning. By segmenting the resonator into multiple poles rather than using a single resonator with a varactor, the patent achieves wide tuning range while maintaining lower phase noise through the combined effect of multiple resonant modes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-pole resonator to a multi-pole resonator structure, adding dimensional complexity to the resonant system. This multi-dimensional approach provides multiple resonance modes that can be independently controlled, enabling wide tuning range without the phase noise penalty associated with single-resonator varactor-based designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If additional VCOs are used to maintain phase noise levels across a larger frequency range, then the phase noise is maintained, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase noiseVSAvoidnumber of VCOs
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple resonator sections are merged into a single integrated multi-pole resonator structure rather than using separate VCOs. The combining of multiple resonant modes within one oscillator architecture achieves the phase noise performance of multiple VCOs while reducing overall system complexity and component count

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-pole resonator serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides wide frequency tuning capability, maintains low phase noise across the tuning range, and operates as a single integrated oscillator. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for multiple specialized VCOs to cover different frequency bands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If a single control input is used to adjust frequency, then the oscillator structure is simple, but the tuning range is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol structureVSAvoidtuning range
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The resonator structure is made dynamically tunable by introducing variable reactive elements (varactors) at multiple poles rather than a single control point. This dynamic configuration allows the resonant frequencies of multiple poles to be independently adjusted, enabling wide overall tuning range while maintaining relatively simple control circuitry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the electrical parameters (capacitance values) of multiple reactive elements within the resonator structure to achieve frequency tuning. By varying the capacitance parameters of varactors at different poles, the oscillator can cover a wide frequency range while maintaining a relatively simple single-control-input architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The MPR design enables a stable oscillation with adjustable phase slope and frequency, significantly reducing phase noise across a broad frequency range while maintaining stability and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The MPR may comprise a variable reactive element such as a varactor and/or a set of switched capacitors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

The gain block applies a gain sufficient to generate a stable oscillation signal at the signal output

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAmplification:

Implementation Method 3

The multi-pole resonator has two or more resonance modes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS12603610B2Oscillator with a multiple pole resonator
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 ANLOTEK LTD
  • US12603610B2 patent drawing
  • US12603610B2 patent drawing
  • US12603610B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An oscillator has a feedback loop with a signal output, a multi-pole resonator, and a gain block. The gain block applies a gain sufficient to generate a stable oscillation signal at the signal output; and the multi-pole resonator is tunable between two or more resonance modes.