Multi-Portal Network Account Verification via Security Criteria

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current network account security systems are vulnerable to unauthorized access, as they rely solely on usernames and passwords, which can be compromised, and additional authentication methods often complicate the login process and are prone to communication network issues, making it difficult for users to detect and remediate account breaches in a timely manner.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilizes multiple user communication portals for verification, where access to a network account is enabled only upon receipt of a communication associated with a first user portal when security criteria related to a second user portal meet predetermined values, incorporating features like location verification and malware detection to enhance security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple communication portals are used for verification, then account security is improved, but login complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccount securityVSAvoidlogin process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is segmented into multiple independent portals (e.g., email portal, SMS portal, authentication service portal). Each portal performs a specific verification function, and the system evaluates security criteria from each segment to make an access decision. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high security while organizing the complexity into manageable, modular components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary security assessments by evaluating multiple communication portals before granting account access. Security criteria are determined in advance from each portal, and only when these pre-established criteria are met is access granted. This preliminary verification reduces the need for complex real-time decision-making during the login process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If additional verification communication is required, then unauthorized access prevention is improved, but user convenience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunauthorized access preventionVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is made dynamic by adaptively selecting which communication portals to use based on the assessed security risk. When security criteria from the primary portal are sufficient, fewer verification steps are required. When risk is higher, additional portals are activated. This dynamic approach maintains strong unauthorized access prevention while adjusting user convenience based on actual security needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes verification parameters (such as the number of required portals, the type of verification, or the security threshold) based on the evaluated security criteria. When security risk is low, the system may require only one portal verification; when risk is high, it increases the number of required verifications. This parameter adjustment balances security with user convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If access is granted based on single portal verification, then login speed is improved, but detection of account breach capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogin speedVSAvoidaccount breach detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the outcome of verification from multiple portals is analyzed to detect potential breaches. When verification results from different portals are inconsistent or when security criteria are not met, the system generates alerts or denies access. This feedback loop enables rapid detection of account breaches while maintaining efficient login processing for legitimate users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8087068B1Verifying access to a network account over multiple user communication portals based on security criteria
Publication Date: 2011.12.27 GOOGLE LLC
  • US8087068B1 patent drawing
  • US8087068B1 patent drawing
  • US8087068B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented system and method for verifying access to a network account are provided. A first user communication portal is associated with a user network account. A request to access the user network account is received from a second user communication portal. Security criteria related to the second user communication portal is determined. Access to the user network account is enabled upon receipt of a communication associated with the first user communication portal when the security criteria is of a predetermined value.