Multi-Position Fluid Valves for Gas Heater Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional heater devices with only two fluid valves lack flexibility and efficiency in adapting to different fluid types and conditions, leading to suboptimal heating performance and increased maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of fluid valves with at least three adjustment positions, where one valve is designed for coarse regulation and another for fine control, allowing for precise control of fluid flow and adaptation to various fluid types without manual intervention, and arranging these valves in close proximity for enhanced precision and compactness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If fluid valves with only two actuation positions are used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to different fluid types and conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve actuation positionsVSAvoidadaptation to different fluid types
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The fluid control system is segmented into multiple independent fluid valves, each capable of distinct actuation positions. This allows the system to achieve complex fluid type adaptation through coordinated operation of simpler individual valve components, resolving the contradiction between device complexity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fluid valves are designed with multi-position actuation capabilities that enable them to perform multiple functions: coarse regulation, fine control, and adaptation to different fluid types. This universal design allows a single valve component to replace what would otherwise require multiple specialized valves, maintaining adaptability while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If fluid valves with at least three actuation positions are implemented, then the adaptability to different fluid types improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to different fluid typesVSAvoidvalve actuation positions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fluid valves incorporate dynamic actuation capabilities with at least three distinct positions, enabling the system to adapt to different fluid types and operating conditions. The multi-position design allows the valves to dynamically adjust between coarse regulation and fine control modes, providing adaptability while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized valve designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If the fluid valves are arranged in close proximity, then the control precision and compactness improve, but the manufacturing and assembly difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple fluid valves are merged into a compact arrangement in close proximity to each other, sharing common mounting structures, fluid passages, and control mechanisms. This integration achieves high control precision and compactness while simplifying manufacturing and assembly through standardized interfaces and modular design, rather than increasing difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3163166B1Heater appliance and method with a heater appliance
Publication Date: 2021.01.20 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP3163166B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3163166B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3163166B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a heating device, in particular a gas burner device, with at least one first fluid valve (10) and at least one second fluid valve (12), which are designed to jointly vary at least one fluid flow. It is proposed that the fluid valves (10, 12) each have at least three actuation positions.