Multi-probe anechoic chamber for adaptive antenna testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for testing MIMO devices are inadequate as they fail to accurately simulate real-world propagation environments, which are critical for evaluating adaptive antennas due to their sensitivity to factors like antenna design, orientation, and baseband algorithms, leading to incomplete performance evaluation.

Innovation Solution

A multi-probe anechoic chamber system is used to emulate real-world RF signal conditions, allowing for the testing of adaptive antennas by simulating various environmental factors such as spatial interference, angle of arrival, and mobility, enabling comprehensive evaluation of adaptive antenna systems under dynamic conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional conducted signal testing is used for MIMO devices, then testing simplicity is maintained, but the accuracy of evaluating adaptive antenna performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptive antenna performance evaluation accuracyVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a multi-probe anechoic chamber system as an intermediary testing environment that simulates real-world RF propagation conditions. This mediator allows adaptive antennas to be evaluated in a controlled setting that replicates complex environmental factors (multipath fading, interference, angle of arrival variations) without requiring actual deployment in diverse field conditions, thus achieving accurate performance measurement while maintaining testing controllability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a copied representation of real-world RF environments within the anechoic chamber by using multiple transmit probes to emulate spatial signal distributions, multipath propagation patterns, and interference scenarios. This virtual environment copy enables comprehensive adaptive antenna evaluation without physical exposure to all possible real-world conditions, resolving the contradiction between testing accuracy and practical feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If simple SISO OTA tests are performed in an anechoic chamber, then testing ease is maintained, but the completeness of MIMO performance evaluation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMIMO performance evaluation completenessVSAvoidtesting procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the MIMO testing process into multiple independent measurement components: individual probe signal transmissions, separate spatial direction evaluations, distinct interference scenario tests, and multiple antenna element characterizations. Each segment can be configured and executed independently, allowing comprehensive MIMO performance evaluation through systematic combination of discrete test results rather than requiring complex monolithic test procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-probe anechoic chamber system is designed with universal functionality to perform various MIMO evaluation tasks using the same infrastructure: it can test different MIMO configurations (4x2, 4x4), evaluate various adaptive antenna algorithms, simulate diverse propagation environments, and assess multiple performance metrics (data throughput, signal-to-interference ratio, beamforming accuracy). This multi-functionality achieves complete MIMO evaluation without proportionally increasing procedural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If adaptive antennas are tested under ideal static conditions, then measurement consistency is improved, but the relevance to real-world dynamic environments deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance evaluation realismVSAvoidtest environment stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic testing capabilities within the controlled anechoic chamber environment by enabling time-varying signal configurations: the system can program probe signals to simulate moving users, changing interference patterns, varying angle of arrival distributions, and time-varying channel conditions. This allows adaptive antenna performance to be evaluated under dynamically changing conditions that replicate real-world scenarios while maintaining the measurement consistency and controllability of a laboratory environment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves real-world relevance by systematically varying key RF propagation parameters during testing: signal strength, interference levels, angle of arrival, polarization, frequency, and temporal characteristics. These parameter changes are precisely controlled through the multi-probe system configuration, enabling the evaluation of adaptive antenna robustness across diverse operating conditions while maintaining experimental reproducibility and measurement reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9660739B2System and methods of testing adaptive antennas
Publication Date: 2017.05.23 VIAVI SOLUTIONS LICENSING LLC
  • US9660739B2 patent drawing
  • US9660739B2 patent drawing
  • US9660739B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The technology disclosed relates to systems and methods for testing adaptive antennas via a multi-probe anechoic chamber, which includes the emulation of real world conditions of a radio frequency (RF) signal reaching a device-under-test (DUT). The technology disclosed can be applied to test and evaluate a range of changed conditions. In one case, beamforming scenarios use separate spatial desired and interference signals, and the results can be compared to uniform interference. Based on performance for a segment of a test profile, the segment can be modified or expanded: shortened, repeated, or repeated with a modification—to fully evaluate the aspect being tested. Also, a dynamic profile that is utilized to evaluate a first device can be saved and repeated as a fixed profile for further testing of a first or second device.