Multi-Radio Antenna Arbitrator for Coordinated RAT Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless user equipment devices with multiple antennas face challenges in selecting the optimal antenna for communication across different radio access technologies (RATs), leading to performance degradation and increased power consumption due to the lack of coordinated antenna usage across various communication types.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a user equipment (UE) device with multiple antennas and processors that collect performance information from one RAT to determine the highest performing antenna and coordinate the selection of antennas across different RATs, such as cellular and short-range wireless communications, to improve communication efficiency and reduce power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple antennas are used for different RATs independently, then each radio can operate autonomously, but antenna performance degradation occurs due to lack of coordination and user grip effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidantenna coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines antenna selection for multiple RATs under a unified coordination mechanism. The processor collects performance information from antennas used by different radios (cellular, WiFi, Bluetooth) and makes coordinated selection decisions, merging previously independent antenna selection processes into a single integrated system that considers all RATs simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal antenna selection mechanism that serves multiple RATs simultaneously. The same processor and performance information collection system are used to manage antenna selection for cellular, WiFi, and Bluetooth radios, making the antenna selection system multi-functional rather than dedicated to a single RAT.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If antenna selection is made independently for each RAT, then each radio can optimize its own performance, but overall power consumption increases due to lack of coordination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges antenna selection decisions across different RATs into a unified process. By collecting performance information from all radios and making coordinated selection decisions, the system avoids redundant operations and optimizes overall power consumption while maintaining communication efficiency for each individual RAT.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If performance information is collected from all antennas for all RATs, then optimal antenna selection can be made, but system complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantenna performance measurementVSAvoidinformation collection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal performance information collection mechanism that serves multiple RATs. The same processor and measurement system are used to collect and evaluate antenna performance for cellular, WiFi, and Bluetooth radios, reducing redundancy while maintaining precise measurement capabilities across all RATs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9853681B2Arbitrator for multi-radio antenna switching
Publication Date: 2017.12.26 APPLE INC
  • US9853681B2 patent drawing
  • US9853681B2 patent drawing
  • US9853681B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A user equipment device (UE) may be configured to collect first performance information from antennas of a first plurality of antennas. The first plurality of antennas may be coupled to a first radio of the UE that may be configured to perform wireless communications according to a first RAT. The UE may determine, based on at least the first performance information, a highest performing antenna of the first plurality of antennas to use for communications according to the first RAT. Additionally, the UE may determine, also based on at least the first performance information, a first antenna of a second plurality of antennas to use for communications according to a second RAT. The second plurality of antennas may be coupled to a second radio of the UE that may be configured to perform wireless communications according to the second RAT.